It makes you think that humans are no better than chimps
2007-01-15 22:35:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
first say a bit about what it is... e.g. left over traits from ancestors that were useful for survival in the past... maybe a bit of darwin and survival of the fittest and gene reproduction..
then look at today's society...
talk about the increase of step families in society.. and how step parents feel about their step children... perhaps use some examples from the news of abuse of step children from non biological parents (bit extreme but gets the point across).....reasons behind the feelings stem from the principles of evolutionary psychology... to do with genetics and paternity....
then discuss step families that run smoothly... how can evolutionary psychology explain this...(Hint ; Altruism and Reciprocity)..
obviously I wont answer the question for you but once you get your head around the principles it is not too bad and you should be able to ...
When I studied Psychology I had this guy as my lecturer.. he makes really indepth web pages... they are worth taking a look at...
http://salmon.psy.plym.ac.uk/year3/PSY339EvolutionaryPsychology/EvolutionaryPsychology.htm
2007-01-15 23:08:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
many of our instincts are leftovers from when we were cave men people are carnivores and as such we instinctively are pack animals , when a cave man while hunting moved in for the kill the rest of his group followed suit .
evolution has removed the need for this skill but the instinct and the psychological effect of it remains . one person in a football stadium can begin a Mexican wave that travels throughout thousands of spectators , why ? psychological evolution that's why .
the same principal is what causes an isolated and relatively small incident to turn into a full scale riot .
2007-01-15 22:41:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
As people have pronounced, the previous nature as against nurture debate is ongoing, and for my section there are sturdy arguments to be made for the two. definite, all of us is pushed by utilising biology to accomplish particular behaviours, yet our capacity to think of has additionally replaced with time. we at the instant are no greater cave people (in certainty) who could merely seek for out nutrients and guard, with the tip purpose of reproducing the species. to illustrate, adult men could be excused from having diverse sexual companions, if somebody says that they are "programmed" to achieve this. females then might could be assumed to wish to advance and nurture little ones, with an identical purpose in ideas. Society as we communicate although i think of is a little greater stepped forward than that, and we've developed previous the factor of merely desiring to have little ones to outlive. there are various females as we communicate who're not interested in having little ones and don't have the nurturing emotions that some might evaluate "established." additionally, many adult men are particularly content textile with merely one baby, and are very able to resisting the urge for something greater. In historical circumstances, those behaviours could have been ordinary, yet as we communicate they are desirable. So definite, those behaviours do nonetheless exist, yet they are able to be tempered by utilising society and rational questioning, and could under no circumstances be used as an excuse for any form of behaviour. that may not clever in the widespread international.
2016-12-16 05:52:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Raed a text book and you will find out. I assume you want us to do your homework for you?
2007-01-15 22:29:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by D B 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Is that how you look at animals and see ourselves in them?
2007-01-18 14:30:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by tboyd322001 3
·
0⤊
0⤋