i can't think of any reason a reasonable person would even consider that option.
2007-01-15 22:07:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Aaron 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ever look up the meaning of each of those words Bill O'Reilly handed you...Secular Progressives?
My question is, how would anyone who was for worldly progress think it was the fault of a 4 year old?
Bill O'Reilly should say that term again while wearing furs and carrying a stone axe. Not only would it show a more meaningful understanding of the term, it would also have comedic value.
Ever wonder why the Bible was the first book printed on Gutenbergs printing press? The Church would have deemed the printing press the devils handiwork. Now ask yourself, was Gutenberg a secularist or a regular god fearing man? Also remember without Gutenberg, guys like Bill O'Reilly, most likely never would have learned the word Secular and how to misuse it.
2007-01-16 06:27:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by eks_spurt 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Doubtful. Although I heard of a judge in England who thought that (in re: to a case in which a 6 (?) yr old was raped). I don't know who's sicker the rapist or that judge...
2007-01-16 06:26:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ask Mark Foley and Kenneth Hastert they have all the experience with this type of sickness... I think the sicko's wanted to blame all of that on Catholic priests, and walk around in denial over their sexual preferences as adults in their late 50's and 60's.
2007-01-16 06:13:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
Let us try and keep the level of questions here. No one with a straight mind can justify rape
2007-01-16 06:09:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ouds 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No way.
2007-01-16 06:07:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
certanly not
2007-01-16 06:04:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by booge 6
·
0⤊
0⤋