2007-01-15 20:43:26 · 9 answers · asked by jess_dan1015 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Actually Bush HAS committed crimes. the US is a signatory to the Geneva conventions. The US has breached many of the rules of war. The most serious being the illegal invasion based on lies for WMD that the US KNEW did not exist prior to the invasion. Invading a foreign sovereign state, when there was NO IMMINENT threat whatsoever from that state, is a serious breach of international law. It was NOT a defensive action, it was a naked aggressive action and illegal. Whether you agree with Bush or not, it is still a crime.
But Bush cannot be tried at the world court as the USA does not recognise the ICC. Blair, on the other hand did sign up to the ICC and should be tried for war crimes.
2007-01-15 21:39:46 · answer #1 · answered by kenhallonthenet 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Does the idea really appeal to you that much.....to try president that one dislikes by a world court......think Clinton would of sent assistance to the former Yugoslavia if he could be tried cause one person disliked it...........don't forget WW2.....nothing would ever get gone internationally
how about all the Dem's that voted for the war.......they were his enablers.......just as guilty.......some will run for president in 2008...they said it was OK to go to war
my question.........how was it that the racist democratic south was part of the progressive party from 1932 to 1980....should the Democratic of been tried or supporting racist state governments....George Wallace was a Democratic governor...all those that fought school integration in the south...all Dem's....check the votes for the 1964 civil rights legislation......republicans passed it......where were the Dem's bud
check who were the governors
was it a Dem or repub that dropped a nuclear bomb...mm-mm
if you're offering a proper trial....all the guilty should be charged
2007-01-16 07:05:49 · answer #2 · answered by Jonathan L 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As a NON signing country to the World Court the USA does not subject it's own people to it. Perhaps you would like to try and grab him and send him to trial? anyone?? Hmmm I though not.
2007-01-16 06:25:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
no wrong category, UN should of tried Sadaam, Bush is not guilty of anything only having people disagree with his politics, the problem is its you people who voted him in the second time around
2007-01-16 04:48:11 · answer #4 · answered by paki 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
are you completely out of your mind by comparing the two of them? What a gd insult, you non patriot!
2007-01-16 09:25:10 · answer #5 · answered by tcbtoday123 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Pres.Bush has committed no crimes. Our Gov. IS working within the laws of the U.N. and in conjunction with N.A.T.O. So get used to it bubba gump
2007-01-16 04:50:47 · answer #6 · answered by Mad Dog Johnson 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Nothing to try him for, so get over it.
2007-01-16 05:40:27 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Will stupid people ever stop asking stupid questions?
2007-01-16 05:09:06 · answer #8 · answered by DixeVil 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, it won't. It has no reason at all.
2007-01-16 05:36:18 · answer #9 · answered by Kiapa So 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋