Saddam Hussain is executed,but did he really deserve that?

Question

I feel he wasn't a criminal.Everyone has the right to protect ourself.And moreover,circumstances always plays an important role in our lives.Then why only Saddam Hussain has paid the cost for self defence.Then what do u call Mr Bush? There were 100's of people died when Saddam Hussain had ordered after he was targeted,but then lacs of people died,many lost their dear ones and financial loss is uncountable..!

Answer 1

Yes, karama

Answer 2

Heavy is the head that wears the crown. In the 4th century BC, to illustrate what kind of happiness, wealth and birth brought to kings and princes Dionysius, the tyrant of Syracuse placed Damocles, his courtier at a luxurious spread table with a sword suspended over his head by a single horse hair. This is called the ; "Sword of Damocles". This is a part of history. Power is attained and used and subsequently reversal takes place. Locking up the disposed leader in jail does him more injustice than a quick death. Not that I agree that Saddam Hussain should have been hanged, but keeping him alive after having lost his throne, would have been a fate worse than death. Now at least to some section of the world he has died a martyr's death - a glorious death - and that therefore to them Bush would be deemed the tyrant - and his death would be remembered in history having fought to the glory of God.

Answer 3

The progress in western countries has led to the refusal of execution in the majority of countries. Opposite opinions still exist in other countries like in the Middle East, however.

Saddam Hussein was really a criminal: to kill innocent people is a crime - that is a fact. No political reasons, based on the conflict between countries (U.S.A. & ? vs. Iraq & ?) cannot wipe it away and give any acceptance to his crimes.

To combine these two issues I can only say: he was a criminal but I do not like executions. Some other strong punishment should have been better for him.

People with different religious and cultural backgrounds may disagree.This is my opinion, however.

Answer 4

You are a misguided soul. Saddam was a mass murderer who killed innocent women and children by gassing them with nerve gas. He started a war with Iran and killed hundreds of thousands. In all he killed about 2 million people. He was protecting himself? From what? He had the third largest army in the world....true full of misfits, but hundreds of tanks, artillery, etc. Did he have a Right to protect himself when he invaded Kuwait? Why did he invade Kuwait (for oil and land land) and kill thousands of Kuwaitis? Saddam should have been caught and killed long before the Americans found him in a rat hole.

Answer 5

no better than assorted others who're the two as undesirable or worse the place assorted human beings are growing to be their information from the lord purely is acquainted with Saddam exchange right into a dictator and evil no person disputes the reality yet he additionally did some solid for Iraq he dragged Iraq from what it exchange into ,into the 20 th century Iraqi adult males and ladies of all religions the place properly knowledgeable in the previous the sanctions all Iraqis have been properly fed and had get right of entry to to scientific care In Iraq the two adult males and ladies of any faith had the prospect of working as medical doctors scientists instructors and so on women have been allowed modest western sort outfits and not compelled to positioned on the veil distinctive faiths lived mutually in equality and peace Iraq now 0.5 of Iraqis say life exchange into better under Saddam 5 million all and sundry is displaced ,living in makeshift camps in neighbouring international locations and without spectacular to artwork or no source of income Hospitals are lacking even the fundamentals to furnish scientific care there has been greater killings because of the fact the occupation than in 35 years of Saddam as much as a one hundred all and sundry is discovered tortured and murdered on the streets of Baghdad on a daily basis women now can not artwork and could be veiled in spite of if non muslim or go through reprisals the government are shia and are forging hyperlinks with Iran to make Iraq right into a radical islamist state those are information which could be certainly checked by using anybody and are understood by using assorted the worldwide apart from u.s.

Answer 6

Saddam Hussein was on trial for the campaign of ethnic cleansing that he supported and participated in during the late 80's and early 90's. Technically, he was guilty and yes he deserved it. On a personal note if you keep trying to act like his ***** Im going to **** you like a woman.

Answer 7

Darth Vader responded to an assassination attempt by blowing up a planet...those Kurds should feel lucky.

Saddam's trial was a farse, so let's not bring the legality of his trial into this and how great it was. The man wasn't as bad as certain leaders are these days...the only difference is that we did not support him. And giving my post a bad rating proves my point.

EDIT: Bubkiss, learn something, okay? Saddam went on trial and was executed for only killing 182 people. I dont know where you got your magical 2 million number from.

Answer 8

When saddam did this cruelty, he was close ally of US. Infact this is US who supplied weapons to Saddam to do mass massacre.
But, unfortunately he was not punished for his crimes. The only reason he was hanged is because he dared to say "NO" to bushes (father and son). Had US wanted to punish saddam for his crimes, why US was close freind of saddam while he was committing the crimes.

Answer 9

Suddam Hussain was another Hitler. But this time the people took care of him. Sentencing him to the life of the people he murdered. Get over it, you get whats coming to you!!

Answer 10

Yes

Answer 11

you listed all good reasons for not executing him, heres another one. saddam was hiding out. at the time he had no real political power(although his influence could still be seen) we found him in a hole. he would of A. died anyway or B. benn found by the iraquis themselves...besides that, there was no reason at all to exucute saddam, besides make alot of iraquies happy. and remember america had *nothing* to do w./ his execution(sarchasm) NO HE DID NOT DESERVE IT!!!