Seriously, how dare she make personal attacks at Condoleezza Rice because of her personal life? Just because shes a senator and a "mommy" doesnt mean that she shouldnt conduct herself with class. I used to like Barbara Boxer but she just ****** that all up I wish shed go home and stay with her goddam family.
2007-01-15 18:51:51 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Tochay! Boxer is basically a good woman but at times very stupid. This time she was overwhelmingly stupid.
2007-01-15 19:48:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you think you followed the session in the Senate to the proper conclusion???
Boxer lit into Rice on Thursday with bitter diatribe during a heated line of questioning before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee looking into Iraq policies. At one point, Boxer turned to the broad question of who pays the ultimate price for war. Rice has never married and has no children.
"Who pays the price? I'm not going to pay a personal price. My kids are too old and my grandchild is too young," Boxer said. "You're not going to pay a particular price, as I understand it, with an immediate family. So who pays the price? The American military and their families."
How many in the old congress had kids in the military and ripe to be sent to Iraq??? I think it was like two members.
2007-01-15 19:36:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah pretty classless. But what do you expect? She's an elitist like so many others in her party. I've never called any of those you mentioned James anything that wasn't true. It's one thing to throw a low blow at ones character that has nothing to do with their job but rather a personal matter. I look at Kerrys Clintons and others history of actions to determine their charaters and they are a bunch of charaters for sure lol.
2007-01-15 19:06:30 · answer #3 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You'd think Boxer used racial slurs against Rice by the way your panties are up in a wad.
She didn't attack Rice, but Limpy Limbaugh has been spinning it and whining about it incessantly. That's typical of Limpy and his ilk, but I'm a bit surprised to see so many drama-queen Connies in tears over this.
Rice was speaking as a parent and she isn't. She got called on it and she probably won't do it again. Live and learn.
I find it ironic and very funny that Connies are supposedly all about "family", but they're being melodramatic about this. Hypocrites.
2007-01-15 19:16:29 · answer #4 · answered by Crybaby Conservatives 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The statements: "Who will pay the cost? i'm no longer likely to pay a own value," Boxer stated. "My youthful babies are too previous, and my grandchild is too youthful." Then, to Rice: "you're literally not likely to pay a particular value, as I realize it, with an instantaneous relations." i'm having a puzzling time understanding how an attack on Rice is being gleaned from this in any respect. I keep in mind that typically comments get twisted to amplify a extra dramatic end than the only meant and its sparkling this has got here about right here. First Boxer admits SHE won't be able to pay a value, through a lengthy time period of her babies and grandchildren. it truly is sparkling adequate. Then, she also factors out that Rice won't be able to pay a own value both because of lack of prompt relations. what's so incorrect about that? it truly is genuine adequate, and she or he known that she isn't any distinct in that regard - neither one in all them will pay a value on the topic of prompt relations. The question nonetheless continues to be unanswered - who will pay the cost? interpreting between the strains to appeal to inspite of end one needs, because the overtly conservative massive apple submit had executed - can bypass both methods. i might want to draw the great that she meant to remind Rice to imagine harder about the households who're paying the cost for Bush's incompetence. it truly is generic that the some distance ideal might want to on the prompt study what they opt for to between those strains and label it an instantaneous attack on Rice for no longer having babies even as obviously Boxer's feedback refer to the households that DO pay a value, and she or he makes use of no longer only Rice, yet to boot HERSELF as an celebration of who isn't paying that value.
2016-11-24 20:43:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A member of Congress, not a rubber stamp like most Republicans want her and the other members of Congress to be. And as far as personal attacks go, I would highly recommend the Republicans read Matthew 7 first, especially the line about removing the log from one's own eye before complaining about the specks in the eyes of others.
2007-01-15 18:56:41 · answer #6 · answered by some_guy_times_50 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Condalesa is a threat to someone of Barbara Bixer's ilk. Condi is the only class act in town.
2007-01-15 19:27:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Who does Barbara Boxer think she is? Ummm, Hillary and Rosie O'Donnel all rolled into one?
2007-01-15 19:04:45 · answer #8 · answered by DixeVil 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Barbara Boxer is the biggest wannabe! If it weren't for her riding Diane Feinstein's coat tails, she'd be clearing tables at the local iHop.
2007-01-15 19:39:38 · answer #9 · answered by RightLeft 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Barbaric Boxer
2007-01-15 18:55:12 · answer #10 · answered by no worries 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋