Lieberman would have made a good democrat, they prove dthat when they kicked him out of the party and he won anyways. But being tied to Gore or Kerry just made the decision to vote rep easy. I agree the Bush clan was the wrong path, maybe we need a anti-relative clause as well as term limits? Carter was as good as any stooge the communists could have selected, BTW someone please go tell Putin the cold war is over and he lost. And try telling China if we aren't too busy getting a rear lube job on the trade defecit. Watching C-Span there are a few dems you can see are serious and appear sincere, even if I disagree with them, and then there are those smirking lunatics that are just out there to read their rehearsed little soundbites, sort of like the muslim "street dramas" you see on Al-Jazeera, where the "dead martyrs" being carried through the streets fall off the plank and have to climb back on to finish their parade. You are right, we need another Reagan, time has shown he was a decent man, he wouldn't even take off his jacket in the oval office because of the respect he had for his role and country, unlike other Presidents who can't even keep it zipped, and whose staff looted and vandalized the White house when they left. And then authorized Sandy Berger to visit the National Archives after 9/11 and remove all traces of their colossal failure on Al Q.
2007-01-15 18:43:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
First off both the Democrats and Republicans are bought and paid for by the same people. They are both working for their constituents, the Military Industrial Complex, special interest groups and Big Business. If you only had a choice between Democrats and Republicans then Ron Paul, Republican from Texas, would be your best choice. Don't know who he is? Do a search on him and you'll find out he's the best choice for President in '08. He runs as a Republican but is a life time member of the Libertarian party.
Other than that I wouldn't vote for either. Instead go out and support a third party candidate. No, it is not throwing your vote away. Remember--if enough people voted for a third party candidate they would get elected. The problem lies with everyone sticking to the Democrat/Republican Lesser of Two Evils belief that has been preached to you since you were a baby. Stop voting for the "lesser of two evils." Evil is evil and giving evil, even the lesser evil, power won't make good things happen.
So in '08 don't vote for the Democrats and don't for Republicans. Instead vote from a member of the Libertarian Party, or the Constitution Party or the Green Party. Go and read up one what they stand for and see who they really represent.
Courtesy of the Texas Nationalist Party
http://www.myspace.com/texasnationalistparty
Links:
Libertarian Party
http://www.lp.org/
Constitution Party
http://www.constitutionparty.com/
Green Party
http://www.gp.org/
2007-01-15 18:59:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
The Clinton administration was able to wipe-out the national deficit; of which, Bush has plunged us trillions of dollars into the red...
Reagan did not win the Cold War; the powers that be at the Soviet Union at the time (Gorbachev, et al) realized that the citizens might revolt, due to wide-spread poverty. Thus, change was necessary, to save the Republic.
Besides, Reagan in his last years had Alzheimer's disease, and it showed; R.I.P.
There is no definitive answer to this question. No one person has the power to right all of the wrongs in American politics, and domestic and foreign policy. We need someone who shall do the least damage.
People knock Hillary Clinton; yet, she has more experience in viewing domestic and foreign affairs from an executive viewpoint than any other candidate, Repugnant or Democrap. She also showed tremendous patience and loyalty, concerning her issues with her wayward spouse.
You can scrutinize anyone; but we shall never know if someone will be able to do a good job, unless they have the actual position.
2007-01-15 19:27:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by MenifeeManiac 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Absolutley not something! it is not a count number number of coverage with them. it is organic hate that he by some skill tricked them out of their rightful position to rule us of a. maximum recient is at the same time as bush suggested he needs to operate better troops and how they bashed him for that ,at the same time as very few months in the past a lot of them were saying we favor better troops. lol that's really uncomplicated to be certain. i'm in awe of their draw close on human nature. They play on peoples thoughts somewhat then supply them information. They position self belief in lies and 1/2 truths to spread their hatred understanding complete nicely that maximum are too lazy to look up the information for themselves. yet they do have tremendous help contained in the media too, the finest of those being the recent york circumstances with the three television networks close in the back of. (ABC NBC CBS) perchance we deserve a Hilary or an Obama because of our international places collective lack of straightforward sense.
2016-12-02 08:44:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like Joe Biden and John Edwards. Actually, I'd rather vote for a 'moderate' Republican for President since I don't think it's ever good for one party to control all 3 branches. However, if the Repubs don't offer up a moderate, I'll even vote for Hillary over a Bush 2 replay or wannabe.
2007-01-15 18:31:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Gemini 5
·
1⤊
5⤋
The Middle East will never be peaceful without ending the Israeli occupation. This is the conclusion of the UN, EU, Backer-Hamilton report, and President Carter new book.
2007-01-15 18:44:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
Bush does not "Kinda Suck"...he absolutely is horrendous! Anyone could do a better job in the white house and that includes former Pres Nixon!!
2007-01-15 18:49:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Joe Lieberman is the ONLY Democrat that I would think of voting for if he ran for President.
2007-01-15 18:29:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sartoris 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
~You're labeling everyone as "crazy." How do you expect to get a reasonable answer? You aren't the only one who has opinions.
I say ANYONE the Democrats have to take Bush's place will be better than Bush!~
2007-01-15 18:29:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
-----I do not agree that President "Bush kinds sucks." Speak for yourself. I sure do not want you as President, or Dog Catcher. ---Jim
2007-01-15 18:35:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by James M 4
·
2⤊
1⤋