English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

elective courses in public educational systems? What do you think?

2007-01-15 17:31:17 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

7 answers

one problem is bilogy is not an elective course in many schools; you HAVE to take it...and modern biology wouldnt make sense if evolution wasnt part of it. Intelligent Design is offered as elective in many colleges; it's just called something more like The Philosophy of the Bible.

2007-01-15 17:35:34 · answer #1 · answered by Dashes 6 · 2 1

There aren't any similarities among evolution and creationism. Evolutionary biology is a technological know-how, while creationism is a devout dogma. Intelligent Design is creationism that was once intentionally disguised to seem like an earthly (non-devout) instructing via its originators within the Discovery Institute, a creationist group. An intercepted private memo from the Discovery Institute certainly discovered that Intelligent Design was once invented as facet of a "wedge technique" to introduce creationism into public university study rooms. The courts have regularly held that the instructing of creationism and/or Intelligent Design in public university study rooms violates the separation of powers clause of the primary modification to the U.S. charter (see the Dover, Delaware opinion written via Judge Joe Jones). Nevertheless, creationist politicians preserve to cross legislation in defiance of the courts. You have to be taught easy methods to google for understanding. Google will deliver you all of the understanding you wish to have.

2016-09-07 21:45:36 · answer #2 · answered by klavon 4 · 0 0

Sure. We have comparative religion classes at our High School. There is no problem putting creationism and intelligent design there.

But creationism and intelligent design should not be taught as science because they do not incorporate the scientific method.

Evolution should be included in the science curriculum. Our understanding of evolution is as proven as our understanding of gravity or electricity.

2007-01-15 17:49:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I say evolution should and creationism shouldn't. Creationism has a religious basis, evolution doesn't. It isn't a religion, it is a scientific theory, just as many we have learned in biology and chemistry etc. I believe in both, but I think it is important that kids learn about evolution. Church should be covering creationism...

What if God created something that evolved into what we know as homo sapiens? It said God created us in his image.. who's to say what that is. Hey, the Bible doesn't mention dinosaurs or ice ages but they existed.

2007-01-15 17:36:29 · answer #4 · answered by gravytrain036 5 · 2 1

Evolution -- mandatory in biology.
Intelligent design -- maybe worth a day in a philosophy class.

2007-01-15 17:53:56 · answer #5 · answered by novangelis 7 · 1 0

There is no reason it shouldnt be. Liberal idiots with high places in the government (in no way GW Bush's fault) have put enough emphasis on the negativity of the teaching of evolution to get it taken out of the curriculum of some schools, while they have no valid point in their protest.

2007-01-15 17:38:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

No - you might as well offer physics and fairy tales

2007-01-15 17:45:01 · answer #7 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers