Are wealthy Liberals stupid or masochistic?

19 ⤊

Are wealthy Liberals stupid or masochistic?

We keep hearing that Liberals want to take our hard earned money and give it to people we all hate. Or should hate.

Rich people will have more taken away from them, so a rich liberal is really just giving a lot of his own money away to those awful people.

Are the rich Liberals, and there are a whole lot of them, too stupid to realize what's happening, or do they enjoy the pain of watching those terrible people enjoy their hard earned money?

2007-01-15 16:52:53 · 16 answers · asked by bettysdad 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics

2007-01-16 07:37:05 · update #1

16 answers

who are these awful people? Maybe wealthy liberals have a social conscience?

2007-01-15 17:00:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋

Liberalism is the thought interior the fee of liberty and equivalent rights. Liberals espouse a huge variety of perspectives counting on their understanding of those concepts, yet many times liberals help concepts which contain constitutionalism, liberal democracy, loose and common elections, human rights, capitalism, and freedom of religion. real liberals might on no account help the concepts of great p.c... it is hardly common elections because of the fact it supplies company wealth severe reward interior the political time table. i'm no liberal yet i do rejoice with gratifying the definition of words as defined for the English language. certainty be counseled each and all of the applicants are decrease from an analogous stone. Obama=Romney=Bush=Clinton sturdy success.

2016-10-07 05:45:23 · answer #2 · answered by shimp 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋

You are a wolf in sheep's clothing.

Liberals are quasi-socialists who for some reason think a large, bloated, bureaucratic government can effectively render aid to its citizens through midnight basketball and publicly funded art and alike. Personal wealth has no effect on their delusion... they all think that throwing money at things will help.

Limousine liberals just have enough money that their lifestyle will not be effected by raising their taxes. Their comprehension of the capitalist nature of individuals and the principles of wealth creation is poor. Many did not work for their money and those that did have forgotten the path they took.

2% of Americans account for 56% of our tax base... Just how much is enough for you Liberals?

2007-01-16 02:41:00 · answer #3 · answered by C B 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋

Bill Gates and Warren Buffet are the top two wealthiest and extremely intelligent people. They are also democrats.
The largest recipients of that hard earned money are old people; your grandparents/parents. Do you or should you hate your ancestors?
I think your anger is misplaced. Hate big government (libs and neocons), not the victims of it.
I am with you on opposition to redistribution of wealth, but your thought process is extremely flawed. If they are masochistic, it is none of my concern. But it is my concern when they want to help others by stealing MY money for their cause.

2007-01-15 17:29:05 · answer #4 · answered by g g 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋

Because liberals are smart enough to realize that the government can't just going on borrowing and spending more than it takes in forever. Republicans aren't that bright.

P.S. Jesus said "render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's". Why do republicans hate Jesus?

2007-01-15 18:11:56 · answer #5 · answered by The answer guy 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋

Here is what is happening. There are two types...Lucky idiots who fall into wealth and don't understand why everyone is not as lucky as they are... Then there are old money liberals, whose ideals were designed by the Ivy elite of the 1920s.

Realize, they don't know what they are doing...they are just parroting what their friends say in all cases. They have no original ideas...they just know what causes people to nod in agreement out of habit. When confronted, all they have to do is put a holier than thou look of shock and gasp of sacrilege to their presence as they reel away from you and recoil like Jesus from Satan... This is the result of Altruism. Men and women are driven to compete for scarce resources...and here comes self-sacrifice as a moral measuring rod to remove scarcity from the mix and replace it with need.

Notice in Marxism...nothing is ever talked about except need...scarcity is replaced by longwinded rants against the evils of imperialism and colonialism.

The problem is no one...and I mean no one...ask anyone you know...understands the full ramifications of these words...

Fascism,
Communism,
Capitalism,
Conservatism,
Zionism,
Totalitarianism,
Altruism,
Socialism...

No one studies these items in school. Just is not a cool thing to do...immersing in the seedy world of politics...and ethics.

But until History is seen as a study in ethics, rather than politics...this world is doomed to fall to tyranny... And until Capitalism creates or finds the advocate of ethical realism it needs, it will be discounted and scoffed as evil...

2007-01-15 17:12:29 · answer #6 · answered by Hammerhead 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋

Asky your mother, she bought your computer for you, she could tell you.

When you get older, you will take a civics class or two, maybe even read the Communist Manifesto, then all the concepts of "Liberal" or "conservative" will be seen as what they are - brain fodder - and you will be more intelligent that you are now.

2007-01-15 17:08:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋

Most wealthy liberals got that way by fooling poor liberals into believing their BS. Yes, I am taking about the Democrats and about 16 republican senators.

2007-01-15 17:00:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋

Havent you heard of tax loopholes? Studies show liberal states are the least charitable.

2007-01-15 20:09:25 · answer #9 · answered by 818er 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋

wealthy liberals and big government is one that i question as well. 48% makes me sick. Tax shelters will only go so far. My assumption is that the power is worth the expense.

2007-01-15 17:03:39 · answer #10 · answered by nick w 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋