Be honest. If you became famous would u blow your money on meaningless things ? or would u help people and save money for your kids and family? would u turn into a person who doesnt care about 'normal' american society? Im just bored... wanna see what people hafta say...
2007-01-15
16:16:11
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Entertainment & Music
➔ Celebrities
Im lovin the answers! lol... Well me personally... ever since i was a little kid i told my family i wanted to be a philanthropist (sp).. little did i know u hafta be rich for all that lol. and as a broke mother of 2 those dreams have little hope left. But im still counting on the lottery lol. I would spend some money on things i dont NEED, but are good to have. I wouldnt have 8 houses 24 cars.. 3 mill in jewelry. None of that, Im all about helpin my kids future, my close family and friends. All poverty areas in america (get kids in school) Just helping everyone! I will never forget where i came from! thanks for the answers everyone!
2007-01-15
16:38:34 ·
update #1
If I became famous I think I would enjoy life to the fullest. What is meaningless to me may not be to you so. I would do all the things I've always wanted to do. I wouldn't have a bowling alley or theatre in my home but I would have a nice home with a hot tub and a huge fish tank. My family would for sure come first. They would all be taken care of and funds would be put away for my children. I also have certain charities that I have always donated to so they would also be on my list. I would also do what I can to enhance materials at schools, hospitals and libraries. I would still consider the average Joe, after all I would still see myself as one. I would still clean my own home, make my kids do chores. It would be nice not to have to worry about bills and being able to buy gifts without having to budget. Here's to dreams.
2007-01-15 16:26:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Michelle 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I may get famous from being an Author, Artist or an Actor, I'm not stupid so now I wouldn't blow my money, my parents save and I know to too. I would also try to help someone if I had enough money to do it too and it depends on the person, good question.
2007-01-16 00:22:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anthony 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no way,, being famous is a privelage, a chance to change peoples llves and do things some people dont get to do ....i would hav a ball if i was famous and no way would i ever want to change into some brainless, vain person who orders people round cos thats a waste of an opportunity, and its fans and people behind the celeb that makes u a celeb cos without the fans and people who help u, u wouldnt be a celeb.... :):) if ever become famous the most important thing is to hav fun and enjoy the ride and be a rolemodel,,but u can only do that as urself
2007-01-16 00:27:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by jezdolly 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
If I were a celebrity I would be someone who worked hard for their money, I would give some of it to my family and to charity, I have to admit I would buy some bling-bling now and then, but not too much like some of these people. I save most of my money for if something happened to me and I would leave it to my family. I will still communicate with my friends because I'm no better than them just because I have money
2007-01-16 00:25:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by xoxo purple 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Would I spend money on frivolous things, of course. Who wouldn't?
But I like to think that if I had lots of money I'd create a theater where my friends, [writers, producers, actors, artists] could make art. I'd have a place to live above the audience [like David Belasco] and there would be just enough money left when I died to keep the space going.
It is more important to live rich than to die rich.
2007-01-16 00:35:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by ajtheactress 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would do a little bit of all of it.
I would have enjoy the money & perks with my family ...I would blow some on meaningless things....I would invest some for the future.....and I would give some to charity.
I'm nothing if not well-rounded
2007-01-16 00:25:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by daljack -a girl 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'd start off by buying a nice big apartment in new york and then one in miami. then i'd set aside money to pay taxes on the homes for the next decade, since fame -- and the big money -- seldom last. i'd hire a cook, a housekeeper and a driver and enjoy that for as long as the money keeps coming in. then i'd invite all of my friends and family to stay with me and have fabulous nights out and share in the fame... because what fun is it alone? the people i'd most like to help are those that are close to me, but nobody wants to feel like a charity case, so i would prefer to let them into my fabulous world instead of giving them handouts... very fun question, since we all love to dream!
2007-01-16 00:22:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by nystrele 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
To be honest, I probably would be a selfish person. I'm not going to lie and say I would be helping people left and right. But honestly though, I'm going to soon realize that life shouldn't be taken for granted. That's when I'll help those who really need it, like the people in our own country for starters.
2007-01-16 00:22:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by sleepy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
well coming from being poor and knowing the value of a dollar, yes to all,except the caring part. if someday i am better off than now, id like to start a scholorship(self supporting) for other than mainstream art.
ive thought pretty heavy into it, and would more than likely acquire an older style motel and turn it into an art shelter for worse than starving artists, just know in my heart id have to have ground rules as far as working in the fields that are "smiled upon". id use every avenue i had to help them on their way without doing it for them.
im a sucker thats all.
as far as normal, not many artist types fall into that category lmao. in fact by definition we are unique, unique meaning boring and normal without saying just like the person over there.
this is something ive thought of alot. it would have to be somewhat self-supporting,ie. helping them to get gainful employment and back to their feet without being a crutch to temporarily prop people up.
Just thought it might be a cool environement to flourish in as well as a heck of a talent pool.
2007-01-16 00:36:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by l8ntpianist 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well to be honest, I think I'd do both. I'd save some money for my family of course, but if i had the money I'd go spend it on stupid stuff, who wouldn't!? I don't think I'd go by say three houses just to say I have three, I'd buy just extra stuff!
2007-01-16 00:20:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by deanna c 1
·
0⤊
0⤋