me for trying to get my workers comp back? my atty will file suit shortly, will my job retaliate and fire me. a girl assaulted me hit my back now im seeking physical therapy.
2007-01-15 14:54:35 · 7 answers · asked by newport l 1 in Business & Finance ➔ Careers & Employment
Nope, they can't fire you, or you'd be able to sue them for that too. BTW...suing your job won't get your worker's comp...you have to appeal the decision through the company that holds the Workman's Comp insurance.
Suing your company for not providing a safe work environment might work if you're looking for more money...however a word of warning...good luck getting a job for another company in the future if they find out you sued your ex-employer.
2007-01-15 15:10:17 · answer #1 · answered by Kim K 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe you have a valild claim. It is up to your employer to provide a safe work place which they failed to do. Not sure what sort of compensation you have received so far, or what you are after, but your employer is liable for damages caused by the girl. They can't legally retaliate, but if you get enough of a settlement, that would be something you won't have to worry about. Oh, and if you are a guy, I wouldn't tell too many people you got your a** kicked by a girl. Keep using the word assault.. or unprovoked assault. Good luck.
2007-01-15 14:59:08 · answer #2 · answered by David L 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your employer will find an "excuse" to get rid of you. They may not "fire " you for suing them, but more than likely they'll come up with a reason to terminate your employment, that you will not be able to fight. Maybe something like incompetent for the position or some other stupid excuse. Sad but true, it can be done and leaving you with no recourse other than trying to find another job, unless of course you have a union job. then the union will fight the company on your behalf, and they generaloly win. Then when you do apply with another company and they ask why you left your last employer, and you say i was fired for suing them.....you see where this is going. Good luck!
2007-01-15 15:11:32 · answer #3 · answered by john h 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To start with that isn't the common Jefferson Starship. It is Mickey Thomas and the Starship. The fashioned Jefferson Starship had broken up and this album (guess how historical i'm) used to be produced after that. Jorma Kaukonen, Jack Cassidy and Marty Balin had cut up, which left Grace Slick and Paul Kantner. There used to be a enormous lawsuit over the use of the identify Jefferson Starship and the end result used to be the "Starship" would most effective be used. Mickey Thomas joined the crew and produced the cheesy music to which you refer and i too, would put on earplugs and maintain the job. However, i'd also listen to the long-established Jefferson aircraft and Jefferson Starship which have been wonderful. That's by and large way more than you wish to have to know about Jefferson Starship
2016-08-10 12:26:46 · answer #4 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most employers have a retaliation clause. This states that they cant retaliate against you for attempting to resolve a situation like this. Although, if this happened at work, the employer is also responsible for the other employee while the employee is on the clock and should be liable for any injuries attained while you are on the clock, no matter whos fault it is.
2007-01-15 15:07:49 · answer #5 · answered by random 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
initially that's not the unique Jefferson Starship. that's Mickey Thomas and the Starship. the unique Jefferson Starship had broken up and this album (guess how previous i'm) exchange into produced after that. Jorma Kaukonen, Jack Cassidy and Marty Balin had chop up, which left Grace Slick and Paul Kantner. there exchange right into a huge lawsuit over using the call Jefferson Starship and the result exchange into the "Starship" would desire to purely be used. Mickey Thomas joined the gang and produced the cheesy song to which you refer and that i too, could placed on earplugs and shop the interest. yet, i could additionally hear to the unique Jefferson airplane and Jefferson Starship that have been staggering. that's in all danger way better than you prefer to be responsive to roughly Jefferson Starship
2016-10-20 06:45:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your claim may be denied. An assault by a co-worker might be excluded from coverage based on the 'intenional acts' exclusion, which means they don't pay for criminal activity.
But what is it that you are trying to get anyway?
If she did assault you.....you should be pursing criminal charges against HER.....not trying to find a golden pocket.
You can sue her in court and if you win....let HER sue your employer for failure to keep the two of you apart.
Your beef is with her and her personal liability policy (in her homeowners or renters policy) NOT with your employers work comp.
2007-01-15 15:06:55 · answer #7 · answered by markmywordz 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋