Why do some liberals choose to ignore things that are repeatedly pointed out to them?

Question

Do they think if they ignore things that make them look like hypocrites, noone will notice????

When will those morons quit with their lies about "Bush lied" when it hundreds of times, people have pointed out that everything Bush said about Iraq, a dozen democrats said about it before he did???

http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html

I can't believe some of the liberals answering on this thread,, "throw in some facts",......

READ THE LINK

Answer 1

Maybe he did not lie. He just mislead. Kinda like a lie but not quite, just not the truth.
Downing Street Memo's
Of course none of these other people had the power to lead us into a false war with Iraq.

Answer 2

Every person from 1:05 on was working under the CIA's bad Iraqi intelligence. All members of Congress got the same report, and being in the shadow of 9/11, we all thought another attack was around the corner.

Answer 3

I guess I would have to answer your question with a question. How many lives were lost because of their lies. It doesn't really matter how many other people were misleading us about the reasons for going to war in Iraq. They didn't make the decision that resulted in the deaths of so many innocent Americans and Iraqis. Eventually it is the one who makes the decision that must take the blame. It was Bush's lies, not the others, that caused this problem. A lot of people lie about a lot of things. But I think very few would lie to the extent that Bush has, knowing that they have the power of life and death for so many people. It is not the morons that say "Bush Lied" that you need to worry about, it is the morons that say, "yea, Bush Lied, but so what" Which group of morons do you want to be in, I know which group I would prefer.

Answer 4

You know it goes the other way tooo.. The conservatives in the congress supported President Bush when the public opinion favored him, now for reelection, they lost, lost badly, and now what are they doing? Not supporting Bush. I don't think it is just liberals, I think the whole issue is about human beings.

Answer 5

candy Voltaire, out of your question i'm able to work out you have an open techniques and are particularly intellegent. human beings make an emotional investment many times situations in a political occasion. Then while the occasion is going incorrect they discover it tricky to enable circulate so the double up on that investment hoping that element will advance. that's like making of venture on a inventory interior the industry and refusing to sell even even whilst its going to 0. Its an ego element. voters might desire to understand that while we vote we would desire to continuously vote for what's terrific for absolutely everyone not purely for ourselves. it might desire to continuously be with regards to the rustic first, The occasion is purely a fashion of turning right into a member of with compatible human beings to sell your political ajenda. i think of socialism is the gold standard thank you to make this united states a bureaucratic dictator deliver and get rid of the freedoms we've left. i urge you to confirm our founding fathers writings. they did not have confidence government and neither might desire to we.

Answer 6

That's good you are behind your president because everything he said, a dozen democrats had already said it. Does that also go for Clinton? Because whatever he did, a dozen republicans had already done.

Answer 7

Well, if a dozen Dems agreed with Bush, did they know that they were wrong? If so than they lied as well.

Answer 8

Well the anti-war guy, John Kerry said that Saddam was a threat... After that, he ran for president and said the opposite... Why do democrats do this?

Answer 9

liberals don't care about facts when they don't serve their cause. the one and ONLY thing they care about is hurting bush and regaining power. plain and simple.

deep down inside, liberals know saddam was a murderous thug and it's been proven many times that he was harboring terrorists and obtaining materials to produce WMD. even their own icon hillary said this herself.

but these facts don't serve their cause. "bush lied bush lied bush lied" is all they want to hear.

Answer 10

Its the residual generational effect of the drugs from the 60's that affects their attention span and lack of comprehension.After all this is the generation that believes in giving kids speed because parents are too lazy to discipline their kids and make them pay attention in school.A paddle usually solved that problem,no drugs no residual effects.lol.Yeh and they never want to see this one either,thier God Clintorus said Sadam had wmd's but the twits refuse to acknowledge it ya know.

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html