They freak out because hes a mormon, which is worse, a cokehead or a mormon
2007-01-15 14:00:16 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's just a matter of poor comunications. They thought that "coke head" meant that he had been an executive at a soft drink company. I'd prefer the Mormon any day.
2007-01-15 14:07:24 · answer #1 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 18⤊ 3⤋
First of all, trying cocaine once doesn't make you a "coke-head." If it was a clear pattern of drug abuse, I would think it would be a serious issue. Again, like someone else pointed out, Bush is an alcoholic and a former drug user.
In terms of Romney, I don't like Mormons. So the answer to the questions is given the choice between Obama or Romney I'd choose Obama.
2007-01-16 21:25:38 · answer #2 · answered by milwaukiedave 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Being a coke head is worse. Why does Mitt Romney being a Mormon have to do with anything. There have been many presidents that have religious background. The fact that he is in the position he is in, shows that he does not push his religious views on to those he governs.
2007-01-16 06:36:37 · answer #3 · answered by Sergeant of Marines 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Having tried coke a few times hardly make anyone a "coke-head". If that was true half of America became coke-heads in the eighties.
Mormons are taught from birth to seek all their answers in the Mormon church. Mitt Romney is not a free moral agent. He's an agent of the Mormon Church.
So... on balance I'd have to say...
Bush is worse.
2007-01-15 14:14:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
Bush did coke and droke drunk into a hedge and yet became President twice. Compared to that, Mormonism is nothing.
2007-01-15 14:29:35 · answer #5 · answered by kungfufighting66 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't freak out at him being a Mormon, that don't bother me, what bothers me is Mitt Romney is a repuglican. Now that is something to be suspicious of.
2007-01-15 14:08:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
because of the fact there are purely some actual liberals on the national political scene considering that Clinton invented the "New Democrats", of which President Obama is one. "New Democrats" are purely professional-selection, gun careful Republicans. the reality that Wall highway executives and companies are the President's greatest supporters underscores this theory. At this element very few national elected officers signify the human beings. generally, they signify their marketing campaign individuals.
2016-10-31 05:33:01 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama gets a free pass.
2007-01-15 14:13:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ill listen to Romney if you listen to Obama. Cut the comments and think.
2007-01-15 14:08:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
liberals work overtime to find faults in their political opponents while defending people on their side.
if a conservative so much as jaywalks, liberals demand a public hanging. yet a liberal can do anything he wants and liberal's will make excuses for him.
2007-01-15 14:41:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋