Would you as a woman ever coerce men into having a baby they didn't want?

Question

I heard in the media a study in a Women's health magazine showed 30% of women admitting lying to their male partner that they could not get pregnant in order to get a baby from the man without his consent. I wanna hear from the women who advocate this of their reasoning. As well as men who've had this happen to them how they felt.

Answer 1

Why would I do that? I don't want a baby. Or a man.

Answer 2

I can tell You that 'yes' there are women who will lie, connive, falsify and basically do what ever it takes to have a child. Most of these women do so in order to justify their own existence through procreation and the self actualisation that comes with the title "mother". In a perfect world where laws actually work and people are held responsible for their actions all pregnant women would have to under go DNA and blood tests so as to prove paternity. The men who have been coerced into the posotion of 'unintended parenthood' are victims and the courts should ensure that They receive justice. A woman can RAPE a man in His sleep and get away with it, and then have the temerity to demand payment for the child's support.
I had a friend who married because He thought He was the Father of the child. 16 years later His 'son' had an accident and required a transfusion. My friend,s blood was not a match. Niether of His children were in fact His. It turned out that not only were they not His but that both His Mother and sister had known all about it from the start and had assisted his wife with Her plans to catch a husband. Apparently He would have been a good catch, but more importantly, it was decided by these women that marriage would be good for Him and that it would help Him to 'grow up'.The marriage was not a happy one. He walked way from university so as to work to earn the money that it takes to have a home and family. Instead of becoming an architect He worked in a printing factory. She (and His Mother and Sister) held that dicision against He for the rest of His life. He died of a massive heart attack at the age of 36. At the funeral His Father and Brothers told His Wife, Mother and Sister that They were not welcome, and that His death was Their fault. A life ruined and wasted, all because of the way some women think.

Answer 3

That is just a horrible thing to do to a person. I would never try to trick anyone into having a baby. Both partners need to agree on this. The 30% would explain why we have so many single Mom out there tho.

Answer 4

You're telling us that you

" heard in the media about a study in a Women's health magazine..."

when what you REALLY mean to say is that you somehow "heard in the media” (no source identified) about some kind of a so-called "study” (the nature of which you know absolutely nothing about) and undertaken by “godknowswhom” (entity remains unknown) was subsequently discussed in a some women's health magazine – by someone somewhere in the universe - (no source provided) and findings of this “study” reported on by the unknown journalist writing for the unknown” Women's health magazine” was further discussed “in the media”...and you thought ???????????

What you have just described is called “heresay”:

hearsay n. 1) second-hand evidence in which the witness is not telling what he/she knows personally, but what others have said to him/her. 2) a common objection made by the opposing lawyer to testimony, when it appears the witness has violated the hearsay rule. 3) scuttlebutt or gossip.

That's not good enough: your presumed evidence is not even second-hand (see above): it’s third, fourth, fifth, sixth hand…in other words, the argument for your case is worthless: it is nothing but scuttlebutt and gossip.

Free tip of the Day: don’t believe everything you “hear”; look to the authority and credibility of the source. If you can’t identify a source then your “information” is merely hearsay; don't get your knickers in a twist over nothing and MOVE ON.

Answer 5

ok, sure, it truly is one lengthy question! What am i able to assert? properly, seem at it this way. back in the Bronze Age, the Israelites were residing in a harsh ecosystem and so that they themselves had to be demanding to proceed to exist. additionally they had an really restricted understanding of the nature of the international. for instance, they idea that pi=3, that insects had 4 legs and that the Universe were created very those days for his or her benefit on my own. additionally they had a range equipment which does no longer enable them count number in tens in case they placed the letters which spelt the call of God at the same time. later on, human beings invented a extra sensible decision equipment which had position fee, then proper fractions, then decimals and they invented a way of expressing the cost of pi extra appropriately. additionally they invented a clean morality in the type of the Sermon on the Mount, and the former testomony went out the window as old, akin to the former decision equipment, because it may not convey morality appropriately. That became a step in the right route. you could't anticipate human beings in previous testomony cases to have the ability to make a cellular 'telephone, a pc or a spacecraft which could go away the photo voltaic equipment or carry out a coronary heart transplant. besides the undeniable fact that, they can make pots, that they had writing components and effortless public well being measures were outfitted into their non secular code. additionally they understood the favor to relax the land and allow it to fill up its factors on the Sabbath, at seven-3 hundred and sixty 5 days durations and on the Jubilee. interior of a similar way, you could't anticipate them to have cutting-part values or a state-of-the-paintings understanding of ethics. besides the undeniable fact that, only as in case you had 2 factors on a graph you would possibly want to have the ability to draw a line by them which shows the route a nil.33 aspect might want to be, so that you'll take previous testomony values as one aspect, New testomony values as yet another and metaphorically draw a line by them with a view to foretell the route in which ethics might want to be predicted to bypass. So, the Torah says men who've been castrated are literally not allowed into the temple, yet Christ's disciples universal them. in recent times i visit't bypass to church in a gown even with the reality that i'm a transvestite, besides the undeniable fact that the day will come after I can (per chance after i have been ordained!), and that is a level on that line.

Answer 6

As a man, I can add this: I've lived with a woman that deceived me and it has adversely affected our relationship for 30+ years. How do I know? I found the 4 month supply of unused birth control pills she continued to purchase to cover her deceit. I don't dwell on it or even speak of it, but that resentment is always there in the back of my mind. In some ways it feels as though you have been violated because the trust was definitely violated.

Answer 7

Frankly? No.
So what if the guy does not want to commit?
Even if he does, there's no guarantee he'll care for the baby. They're smarter now too; they ask for paternity tests just to be sure.
I hate to think what the ramifications are if your partner discovers the deceit/ web of lies you've created.
You might end up with more trouble than you've bargained for, not to mention a baby you didn't want in the first place.

Answer 8

Thirty percent? Who the hell did they poll? That's totally ridiculous.

Any woman who would trick a man into having a baby is just as bad as a man getting a woman pregnant and then disappearing.

Both situations are vile, disgusting, and inexcusable.

Answer 9

30% seems a little high to me.

I do know someone who did that, and I think this was her reasoning: she thought it would change her man into a wonderful husband and father.

Wrong and wrong, and now she is a single mother with a broken heart.

Answer 10

I would never do this nor do I condone it! Bringing a baby into the world should be something BOTH parents agree upon and no tricks or lies involved