I've heard Iranian troops and weapons have been found in Iraq. I've heard also that these troops and arms are responsible for the deaths of American soliders. Why doesn't this count as an Act of War?
2007-01-15 13:18:46 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Do you have a source?
2007-01-15 13:21:39 · answer #1 · answered by Abu 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush said that. He also said Iraq had WMDs.
It's just another excuse for more war. Bush and Israel already have their battle plans ready to invade Iran. Now all they need is an excuse. If none can be found, they'll just make one up.
By the way, Bush's invasion of the Iranian Mission in Iraq is considered an act of war under the rules of engagement. So technically, Bush has already attacked Iran.
2007-01-15 21:36:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, these weapons stamped with Iranian insignia have been found. Yes, they have been responsible for the deaths of American soldiers. Yes, this does count as an Act of War and yes, we did raid their Embassy in Irbil and found proof of this. All I can say is, they better stop it soon, or they will be vewwy vewwy sowwy.
2007-01-19 04:04:55 · answer #3 · answered by red d 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For the same reason when me and my friend take over a bar in Mexico. It is just a group of individuals. Yes, if found aggressive they should disappear. Iraq should be known to Iranians as a place people disappear from.
2007-01-15 21:22:37 · answer #4 · answered by Stop_the_Klan@yahoo.com 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Did they violate American sovereignty?
Last time I checked we hadn't made Iraq the 51st state.
They have as much right to be there as we do. We are both visitors in Iraq.
Don't worry though, I'm sure we will declare war on Iran soon.
2007-01-15 21:23:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
what would you do if a hostile country was invading a country next door to you? Sending aircraft carriers into your local seas and bombing your trade partners? I would think you would probably do anything you could to try and pervent them from getting a strong hold on that land they are trying to forcefuly take from that said nation. People really need to get a clue and start thinking before they think and then think some more because not thinking seems to be a critical desease in this world.
2007-01-15 21:24:59 · answer #6 · answered by magpiesmn 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
You need to surrender to Iraq first!
2007-01-15 21:23:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Iraqis say they gave them permission, now these are the people that is going to lead the next conflict
2007-01-15 21:22:55 · answer #8 · answered by AD 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
because it is bound to be there, if Iran is funding terrorism, and militant action, and likewise wanted Saddam out of power!
you people don't follow your own lines do you?
now is it starting to become clearer to you??
Al sadr radical cleric...most likely Iranian friendly.....iraqie new government composted of Al sadr loyalists! hmmmm
2007-01-15 21:22:15 · answer #9 · answered by qncyguy21 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If the President would say this is an act of war, liberals would pour out of the woodwork and actually cut funding to our troops.
That is why.
2007-01-15 21:22:41 · answer #10 · answered by Shaddup Libs 5 · 2⤊ 5⤋