2007-01-15 13:12:56 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
A sucker punch...oops, I mean preemptive strike is something the US is good at. So it's not 'should America' but 'will America'.
2007-01-15 13:41:16 · answer #1 · answered by Webber 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Actually the question is should America attack Iran even if they are perfectly aware that Iran will never attack US?And the answer is no,they shouldn't...We saw what happened after they attacked Iraq for an imaginary reason and creating chaos in one country without knowing how to deal with it it's enough...And Iran is going to be much worst than Iraq...
2007-01-18 20:49:28 · answer #2 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The odds of Iran making a direct attack on the USA are astronomical. America is not the country in the sites of the religious zealots and their crazy President. Israel is in their cross hairs.
The real shame is that this country of mostly moderate and peaceful Muslim people is controls by lunatics that don't care who lives or dies. Even their own people.
2007-01-15 13:23:31 · answer #3 · answered by rikv77 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iran has ignored an substantial factor of actuality: nature. in the international Earth the wind regularly blows from the west to the east. If Iran have been to attack Israel with nuclear weapons the fallout might blow returned on the middle east farther than Iran. definite, Israel may be crippled critically, yet greater Arabs might die than Jews. Israel sits and waits. She does have long ideas. whilst the time is mandatory, the two stress from the U. S., Russia, Britain, China, France or the Arab states will nullify the risk or Israel will end the risk with determination and stress. Iran could awaken and smell the neutrons.
2016-12-16 05:38:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We allready tried that in Iraq and you see how thats going. It's Sad that so many Americans have to be smacked in the Face before will return fire. I'm affraid America will have to deal with another 911 before we take out Iran. I HOPE that NEVER happens. Another 911 that is But Will see.
2007-01-15 13:21:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
We should do whatever is logical. Something along the lines of reason for a change.
2007-01-15 13:19:07 · answer #6 · answered by Stop_the_Klan@yahoo.com 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only the Cons know the answer
2007-01-15 13:20:21 · answer #7 · answered by AD 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-01-15 13:17:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
no, we should let them keep enriching uranium, because we know it is for 'peacefull' use, since they turned down the offer for uranium enriched to the point of energy use, supplied to them for virtually no charge.
2007-01-15 13:21:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If not now, then tenfold in the near future.
2007-01-15 13:21:06 · answer #10 · answered by Shaddup Libs 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋