http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16609997/site/newsweek/
2007-01-15 12:56:49 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Like the article I have linked, I am also refering to the war in Iraq.
2007-01-15 13:03:13 · update #1
EIther way are president is pretty Phucked up!!!
2007-01-15 13:05:26 · answer #1 · answered by AC/DC = BEST Rock band ever 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Who knows how many more 911's we would have had in the US if all the fanatics and terrorist were not fighting us over there?
We'll never know untill we come home. If the terror attacks start happening here again then will you admit you were wrongheaded?
2007-01-15 21:04:35 · answer #2 · answered by aiguyaiguy 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Just like the risk of an attack by the Germans on the U.S. in 1942 was dramatically greater than in 1940?
your logic is illogical. It doesnt work that way.
Of course the risk is greater now, weare involved in a war!!!!
2007-01-15 22:41:49 · answer #3 · answered by urbanbulldogge 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Certainly.
2007-01-22 20:57:46 · answer #4 · answered by robert m 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The truth is unless we stop supporting Israel and appease the terrorists and hostile countries in the mideast, the terror risk will always be there whether we do anything or not, it doesnt matter.
2007-01-15 21:50:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
When you clean out snakes out of barn they are all going to come out for a while it is going to be tough,but I rather kill the snakes in the barn rather than wait tell they come into my yard and kill my kids.
2007-01-15 22:05:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'd agree that he's not the sharpest tool in the shed.
2007-01-15 21:16:25 · answer #7 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the war on terorism or the war in Iraq???
2007-01-15 21:02:02 · answer #8 · answered by glduke2003 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
at least we're not on 'orange' anymore. whew, that was close!
2007-01-15 21:01:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋