They're so biased, they make the old "Pravda" look like a paragon of journalistic integrity by comparison. Has anyone been following the flap over their feature about the El Salvadoran woman supposedly serving a 30-year sentence for having an illegal abortion? Even the Times' own ombudsman admits that is a false claim. She was convicted of infanticide after the autopsy showed the baby was born alive and then strangled...yet the editors refuse to clarify or retract.
The Times has never met a liberal position or cause it disliked...and is becoming more and more willing to lie and sitort in order to further said causes.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/uc/20070105/cm_uc_crmmax/michelle_malkin20070105
2007-01-15
12:29:24
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Rick N
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Hottie: if this were an op-ed piece or a story about which the facts weren't so clearcut, I would probably agree with you. Please follow the link I provided. You'll see such is not the case. This story was just plain ol' fiction, pure and simple.
2007-01-15
13:08:27 ·
update #1