i have gotten pregnant again as early as four months after childbirth.
2007-01-15 12:19:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Thumbs down me now 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
properly... my brother and that i are 11 mos aside so he became in reality 2 mos previous even as my mom were given pregnant with me. I actually have a cousin who's babies are 10 mos aside. it truly is fullyyt plausible to get pregnant the first time you've relations contributors after having slightly one no matter if or not it truly is 2 wks, 4 wks, 6 or 8 wks. Breast feeding can cut back that possibility by delaying the starting up of ovulation by as a lot as 6 mos yet isn't one hundred% foolproof.
2016-11-24 20:11:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by pariasca 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A friend of mine got pregnant four weeks after having her son. But think of it this way do you really want to have two kids under the age of one. Yes babies are easy when they are little but can you imagine having to chase after a crawling baby and keep ahold of your newborn, not to mention having to buy two cribs because your first child is not going to be out of his/her crib by the time the next one is born. buying two kids formula. It all sounds like too much for even super mom's out there. I would rethink it but that is just my opinion you do what you think you can handle i wish you the best of luck.
2007-01-15 12:09:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I know of people that have gone for their 6 week check up and be pregnant again.
My sister and i are 17 months apart so that means i was 8 months old when my mom had my sister. I think that is right.
2007-01-15 12:07:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by ஐ♥Julian'sMommy♥ஐ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
well if u ask me i wud say its your wish not being rude here if u can handle it thn go ahead ur baby is 1 mth old n by time the second arrives ur baby wud be almost 1 year old n u will need to care for both the babies.
the best time to get pregnant with the send one wud be whn ur first is 2 or 3 years old tht he/she wud understand the addition to the family n they wud be able to take care of them self a bit so its easier for urself also
2007-01-15 13:36:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by ♥ Sunshine ♥ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is not good for your body to get pregnant so soon after the first baby. Why not spend some time and attention with your newborn before having another? I think that you shold wait at least a year to give your body time to heal and your baby time to him/herself with you.
2007-01-15 12:13:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by mom of twins 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I know somebody who had 2 children in the same year! one in January, and then on in December! Man I would not want to do that! You are going to be pregnant for almost 2 years!
2007-01-15 13:35:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by ME 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are supposed to wait 12 months because that's how long it takes for your uterus and hormones to go back completely back to normal. I've heard some doctor's say that 6 months is probably okay, but before that there is an increased risk of miscarriage.
2007-01-15 12:03:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Melissa 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
You are most fertile 6 weeks to 6 months after having your first. My children are 14 months apart
2007-01-15 12:14:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by emilysmom182004 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
This depends on whether you are breastfeeding or not. If you are not breastfeeding, your first period will occur about two months after childbirth. However, there is no way to know when you begin to ovulate again - 90 percent of women will not ovulate before their first period. So contraception is essential if you have sex soon after childbirth.
2007-01-15 12:04:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Linda 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
i know somebody who got pregnant two weeks after having a baby. its easiest to get pregnant right after you have a child. let your body heal from the last one though. you'll need some time to breathe! it is good to have em' close together so they'll have somebody to grow up with and play with. congrats on the little one! good luck on having another!
2007-01-15 12:12:05
·
answer #11
·
answered by superyduperymommy 5
·
2⤊
0⤋