No the way to figure it out is... use the x value in the coordinate (2, -4) x = 2 and y = -4 and plug it in and c if you get -4 for the y. That is does
-4 = -4(2) + 2
and the answer is no
2007-01-15 11:46:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
To solve this question, simply put the coordinates into the equation and see if it creates a true equation.
-4 = -4(2) + 2
-4 = -8 + 2
-4 = -6
Since the two sides don't equal out, the statement is not true. The point is not on the line.
2007-01-15 19:47:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by baka_otaku30 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
2 - No ...
-4(2) + 2 = -6, not -4
In order for the point to be on the line, the x coordinate must be properly calculated to get the y coordinate. The point would work for x = 2 if y = -6. For y = -4, then x must equal 1.5
2007-01-15 19:45:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by icehoundxx 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
2. NO
Plug it in and see if it works.
y = -4x+2
-4 = -4(2) + 2
-4 = -8 + 2
-4 = -6 ?
False
Therefore, (2,-4) is NOT on the line.
2007-01-15 19:45:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by gamefreak 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
No. The point (2, -6) is
2007-01-15 19:44:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
for x=2
y = -4*2+2 = -6, which is different than -4, so the answer is NO
2007-01-15 19:46:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by TV guy 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
y=-4x+2 substitute -4 for x
y=-4(-4)+2
y=16+2
y=18
18â 2 so
2. NO is correct
2007-01-15 19:45:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
-4=-4(2)+2
-4=-8+2
-4â -6
No because the correct point set would be (2,-6)
2007-01-15 19:53:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No
Substitute your points into the equation to validate them.
2007-01-15 19:45:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by lifesajoy 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
no. substitute the value of x in the equation and it should equal the value given for y. but it doesnt.
2007-01-15 19:45:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by ~Moi~ 2
·
1⤊
0⤋