Is The Bible copyrighted? Can I use biblical verses in my book. Thanks.?

Answer 1

it depends on what version you want to use.

"No one owns the copyright on the Bible itself. Rather, the copyright is held on particular translations or editions of the Bible. The Confraternity of Christian Doctrine (CCD) owns the copyright on the New American Bible translation. Some versions of the Bible, such as the King James Version (not the New King James Version) are in the public domain.

The copyright allows the owner to protect the integrity of the text so that individuals may not introduce changes without permission. Royalty fees earned by licensing the text to companies who publish and sell Bibles help to provide funds for Scripture scholarship and other educational needs."

Answer 2

No it is not copyrighted. No one can own the copyright to the Bible even if they say they do. It is God's words, not man's. Man always tries to find a way to take credit for what God did. But you can use quotes and scriptures in everything you do. You don't have to say which Bible you got it from either, but you may want to so if people want to look back in the Bible and see the version you got it from, bcuz man is fallible, and since they are changing the languages from greek and Hebrew, words change and translations are different. Or people make an amplified version or one that is easier to read, but it may be a little different than say the kjv or the niv.

Answer 3

Yes it is copyrighted but you can use biblical verses as long as you cite which bible you got it from. There are different versions of the bible. So make sure you cite it the right way.

Answer 4

No. It is not copyrighted. It is meant to be used in each and every book and referred each and every time. Plagiarism is not a crime as far as the bible is concerned because any quote that is in the bible is already known to at least half the world, and all know Gods word to be Gods word and of none else.

Answer 5

tremendous question, it truly is from those questions or similar ones that the reason behind putting a canon at the same time became a ought to. because in the early Church there became branch through which scripture to settle for as inspired and which now to not. The early fathers, did only that, reviewed all the writings and this began in the early second century and did not get practice as one certain reproduction till early in the 4th century. yet connection with the Gospels and the letters as being inspired might want to be found in the Scripture itself, and those references and the very incontrovertible reality that they were back scrutinized made for the alternative. So it wasn't taken gently and it wasn't some thing that became only executed. Then in the 15th century we get the reformation of Martin Luther, who bythe way became a Catholic monk and believes in his coronary heart that there became no way that he might want to properly be saved, and desirous to get rid of a few texts from the Bible, which he referred to as no longer inspired because they weren't in the unique Hebrew yet Greek, even as it got here to the OT writings. it truly is ironic because all the NT writings were in Greek yet those sufficed for him. He later went on to state that the Church became no longer a necesity Scripture became the in reality key to salvation. The leaders of the Church in his day mandatory reforming, it became run by human beings out for themselves and it truly is agreed upon by the Catholics of on the prompt to boot, yet he had to reform the Chruch as an entire, holding issues that are classic and scriptural as no longer being from those. This delivered about better deception, because it does no longer state everywhere in the Bible that a guy won't be able to have 2 better halves, and Luther conceded to this in a prince of the region, and the human beings revolted hostile to the reformer. it truly is sad that from such mandatory substitute to those who ran the Church, some thing of such seperation got here about, and ever the added reason we favor to wish all the harder. So sola scriptura is a textual content from the Bible, Romans 10:9-10 taken out of context, becuase all in the course of the Bible it obviously states in the different case. It takes significantly better than only interpreting a collection of words to stay and love God, understand Jesus and understand what it truly is quite be Christian, it takes custom, Scripture, Works and the concept that a majority of those are executed with Christ on the top of all our judgements, it truly is Biblical and reality. God bless and Raven i idea i'd commend you on your answer to boot.

Answer 6

You have full right to quote from the Bible and for that from any religious scripture in the world. But you can 'quote' and not 'misquote'. Secondly, you should mention your source by giving the details of the publication and edition etc.

Answer 7

It's not copyrighted any more than Beowulf or the Iliad is. Go ahead and use whatever verses you can fit into your story.

Answer 8

Dear,
The Bible itself say in Mat 10:8 "freely ye have received, freely give".

So you do not need any permission and the only thing is that you must do is that you must use it for the glory of our LORD JESUS CHRIST because the Bible says in Exo 20:7
"Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain".

Answer 9

You have to pay each descendant of Abraham a 1% royalty.

Just Kidding, of course you can quote and reproduce the bible freely.

Answer 10

anybody can use biblical verses anywhere. nobody is going to punish u. but use it properly and try to understand it and love Jesus.