English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

It would be very clean, for one. The earth would be better of without humans in general since animals wouldn't be making conscious decisions that may have catastrophic results which the planet has a hard time bouncing back from. There would still be 'bad' things happening but it would all be part of the natural balance. Any of that would obviously have nothing to do with the world as we know it since it would be an entirely different place without us.

2007-01-15 11:04:30 · answer #1 · answered by Pico 7 · 1 0

Actually I believe the world as in earth would have a longer life span without humans, but if humans didn't exist we would have no concept of better or worse

2007-01-15 10:57:58 · answer #2 · answered by bluebettalady 4 · 0 0

Honestly. I believe that it would. Humans have virtually depleted many of the natural resourses with little regard to the ecosystem or the lives of wild-life, etc...

Unless we, as a mighty group, come together to reverse the damage we've already done....we'll eventually destroy it all anyway & it won't be able to support any kind of life...maybe not even bacteria as in the event of nuclear devestation on global scale.

Frankly, I'm not sure that humans are ready for the responsibility that comes with habitation in such a complex world.

2007-01-15 11:53:22 · answer #3 · answered by Shadow 7 · 1 0

I comprehend what you asking, yet from what attitude. the opportunities are infinite. which includes pollution would really reason some damaging outcomes and be preventing different damaging outcomes on nature. Your asking human beings to respond to a question of what issues might want to be without us. we may be able to outline how issues are with us yet we are able to not outline something without us being component to it or viewing it. ok Seattle would not exist. No human sees it, how do all of us understand even if that's "a captivating woodland, complete of organic world and untainted air water and soil." Scientist let us understand it truly is the way it would want to be, yet we are able to not understand. perchance Seattle is less than water, with the aid of three different phenomenon contained in the evolution of the earth. perchance it is coated in oil that seeped out of the earth because guy changed into not right here to pump the oil out of the earth. Lot's of issues were happening earlier the emergence of guy. i for my section wouldn't have had to be round in the course of the extinction of the dinosaurs. You state that guy has raised the extinction price much better. What might want to the extinction price be in guy's 12 months 2007 if guy changed into not at very well here. Is it accessible that the extinction price changed into really worse because better animals were getting superior faster and killing nutrition faster than that's replaced? the hardest component to the study of technology is to save our own bias out of the equation. Many study initiate with information from asuming the outcomes and then proving them. i might want to be very shocked if any study were carried out with the pretense that polution has had any positve result. the opportunities are infinite.

2016-12-02 08:17:57 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

i think the world would be better if 'certain' humans didn't exist.

2007-01-15 10:58:12 · answer #5 · answered by apolloK♫ 4 · 0 0

Well, not ALL humans, but most. The only reason a lot of people are still alive is that it is illegal to kill them...and THAT is all!

2007-01-15 10:57:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the condition of the world would be better, but the world wouldn't have any awesome buildings, cars, cities, and would be very dull.

2007-01-15 10:57:11 · answer #7 · answered by ۞ JønaŦhan ۞ 7 · 0 0

Yes, we are going to be the world's downfall very soon.

2007-01-15 10:56:55 · answer #8 · answered by Kameo 5 · 1 0

Sometime i think it would...but at times i think it would have the oppisite effect..it depends most of the time.

2007-01-15 10:58:32 · answer #9 · answered by Scarlett 5 · 0 0

Healthier and more natural, but less interesting.

2007-01-15 11:07:16 · answer #10 · answered by Girl Machine 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers