English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Alimony comes from a time when women were not ALLOWED to divorce their husbands - only a husband could divorce his wife. Alimony was the money the man paid for his decision to divorce.

But if men and women are "equal" why should anyone pay any alimony? Especially why should the person filing for divorce get anything? (And yes, I'm aware that in some very few cases men have received alimony - so if the gender fits - wear it.)

In recent times, the argument is that alimony is paid for the "services" rendered by the woman: Cook, housekeeper, etc. But no offset is permitted for what they get in return: room, meals, utilities, clothes, transportation - all of which total up to much more than their services were worth.

So which is it? Are women equal (and not entitled to alimony)? Or are they nothing more than money-grubbing whores who are taking advantage of laws that have not yet caught up to the times?

2007-01-15 10:08:15 · 6 answers · asked by A_Patriot 2 in Family & Relationships Marriage & Divorce

6 answers

totally agree with you. those who fight to get allymony are stupid women not capable to get a job and take care of themselves! GOLD DIGGERS!

2007-01-15 10:58:10 · answer #1 · answered by chikis 6 · 0 0

Sounds like you are the payor of alimony. There are many factors in determining spousal maintenance (alimony). You mention things that women get out of a marriage. Cooking - ok, a lot of us work too and cooking should be shared. Clothing - again, a lot of us work and provide our own clothing. Housekeeper - yep, we clean up after you all the time. Transportation - I work, I bought my own car.

We are equal, but are not compensated equally in the working world. If you feel that women are "money-grubbing whores" why get married in the first place? Why not just live your miserable life by yourself?

2007-01-15 10:21:40 · answer #2 · answered by Starla_C 7 · 0 0

Excuse me...

I am as equal as any woman out there but for the 20 years I was married to my Ex he REFUSED to let me work, he stated that a womans place was in the home taking care of her family. He said, not just to me but to the lawyers and judge at our divorce hearing, that woman working today is what has ruined ALL of the job markets for men what with the equal rights the jobs that once belonged to men coming out of school or college or the military now the employeers have to hire so many females or handicapped. He also claimed that any man that LET his wife work outside the home was not a man if he could not support her properly. I was untrained in the job market, I did not ask him to go out evrynight and drink and fool around with girls younger than our own daughters, our home was always clean and his clothes were always washed and mended. I kept my weight and appearance pleasing for him, I never liked to shop so over spending was not one of my faults. He kept the check book, doing the shopping together on the weekends he knew exactly was was bought. He made out the checks for the household, my job was to put them in the mail as he had them listed. My divorce was proir to cell phones so I had to be within ear shot of the land phone whenever he called. I did have a car of my own, the family vehicle, but he checked the milage daily to see where I went and how far. He was a controlling person that looked at life "do as I say and not as I do" and he told all this to the judge. The judge that granted our divorce said to him "this is the worse case of mental spousal abuse I have ever seen in my 23 years setting on the bence". He ordered lifetime alimony (if I should remarry or die it would seese) and 50% of all the marital assests. I was to receive 1/2 his pension and 1/2 his stock. I took the judge up on his generious offer for 5 years, in that time I educated myself, found a wonderful fulfilling job, met a man that had the same type of marriage as I had as far as the controlling part and he too was divorced. It will be 9 years since the judge freed me from that life and 4 years now since I have made a life with my fiancee. We went back to court and had the pension and alimony removed from the divorce greed. The stock has been sold and put in an annuity for the Grandchildren if something should happen to me before I retire and need to live off it. As for your finale question...no we are not money-grubbing whores, or at least not all of us, we were and still are hard working women that need the courts help sometimes to make life with jack-offs fair.

2007-01-15 10:37:34 · answer #3 · answered by sassywv 4 · 0 0

it particularly is not genuine that adult males loose each thing; maximum are lots greater helpful off after the divorce than in the process the marriage, while the ladies and little ones are lots worse off after divorce than in the process the marriage. IF a female has a job, then it particularly is my information she would not get alimony, yet purely help for the little ones while she's regular care giver. (Fathers ought to verify their little ones are cared for, in spite of in the event that they now no longer care approximately their ex-different halves.) IF a female isn't earning an income, with the information that her husband is the salary-earner, and he or she takes different accepted jobs, then it particularly is incorrect to easily toss her out on the line to starve. once you upload that oftentimes women end their training to place HIM by using college, with the above information, and so are not qualified for respectable-paying jobs, the case for alimony is better. provided that approximately 80 % of individuals who make the regulations are adult males, no longer women, your final question is absurd. Now, IF a guy has been the stay-at-dwelling house spouse, then she ought to furnish for him till he can get a respectable interest. (in simple terms as divorced women are oftentimes predicted to hunt for employment, and at that factor no longer get alimony any further.)

2016-12-12 12:10:53 · answer #4 · answered by deibert 4 · 0 0

as a woman who receives alimony i see both sides.....i understand where can be coming from and if the alimony is not used for it's intended pupose than i completely agree with it noy being rendered but in my case i was an abused woman foe three long years...i was not allowed to work and i was only allowed to go to college parttime.....and contrary to some beliefs he left me i didn't leave him....he was inssued to pay alimony simply because he wouldn't allow me to work while we were together an dleft me with two kids and no income with many, many student loans outstanding.....my alimony goes towrd paying daycare and some bills around the house(working a full time job and going to school i still can't bring in what he did) and one half of my check goes directly to pay for my school.....as long as it used for it's intended purpose then i feel that it is completely ok

2007-01-15 10:38:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i totally agree with you

2007-01-15 10:18:29 · answer #6 · answered by smurf_punky 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers