adopting baby David, when now it has come to light that she paid for Mad & zee, & that was why she has never spoken to her father
since he let the world know.
strange to that they cant find the lawer who set it up.
I also find it a bit sad that she says she feels more closer to Mad & zee, than her own daughter.
2007-01-15
09:56:06
·
11 answers
·
asked by
**ZARA**
7
in
Entertainment & Music
➔ Celebrities
for MUSE it was in the mags,
Also E news.
2007-01-15
10:15:10 ·
update #1
to Jessica N -I asked a question, do you not know that it is very rude to answer in caps -its a form of shouting, there was no need for that - i looked at some other answers you gave . one being A Jolie was your cousin - then another one asking how you can contact her - it seems your a die hard fan - so why not see if she has a fan club you can join.
2007-01-16
23:15:13 ·
update #2
Jolie rules...She thinks with her heart and that's not a bad thing. Its understandable as to the situation with Mad and Zee.
As for Madonna, she's such a show and tell. She's fading as a musician so why not try something new. She's such a needy person who need constant attention. Other people adopt from a place where there are too many to care for....she went right under a father's arms and had hers. Maybe, the children in the orphanage are too filthy or did not have enough family history. **
2007-01-15 21:38:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by NEMESIS 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
First of all, I think wherever you want to adopt, you have to pay. Just look at how much it costs to adopt here in the US! As for her relationship with her father, if you have followed Jolie at all you would know that they have been estranged for years, not just because of this incident. I think she made some good points about her children. Shiloh is going to have everything in her world. She isn't going to be born wanting a mom and a dad, wanting food and shelter or anything like Zahara and Maddox were. And I don't think she said that she feels "closer" to them, I believe she said that she "feels more" for them because of where they were before she adopted them. Jolie was very professional and didn't get catty when talking about Madonna's adoption. She stated that she wouldn't have adopted from there because of their adoption laws, but she was sympathetic towards them. Why are we criticizing celebrities who want to adopt and give these children a better life anyway? Look how much good Jolie especially has done to bring light to causes that we should all be aware of. Praise to Jolie and Pitt for being conscientious celebrities and not being like Paris who has all the money in the world yet is a pathetic skank.
2007-01-15 18:07:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by kaliluna 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
I disagree with you re: Angelina. I think everything she does is motivated by good thoughts. As far as Madonna adopting, I think she was jealous of the recognition Jolie-Pitt was receiving and she couldn't stand it. I believe she loves all her children but feels a special affection for her 2 adoptive children because w/o her help they didn't stand a chance at a good life.
2007-01-15 23:08:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by tcbtoday123 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Personally, I think Angelina Jolie adopted her kids for the right reasons, to give them a good home. As for her relationship to her biological daughter, I doubt that she feels closer to the two she adopted. She has a special, but different bond with each child. I do wonder, though, what will happen to the kids when she and Brad realize that they are completely different people and split, but that's a different story. But, as to the relationship with her father, John Voight has been very vocal about telling whomever will listen his opinions of how his daughter lives, even questioning her mental state at one point. Sounds to me like he's got some issues and it's probably good for all concerned that he isn't around.
2007-01-15 18:15:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Viewaskew 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
No. i think she is genuine. she has done a lot 4 the third world and is making a difference. Unlike madonna who brought baby david back as casually has u would an hand bag!!
2007-01-15 18:22:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by laura G 1
·
0⤊
3⤋
She's shrouded in mystery, a little odd I agree but I have the feeling that strange things go in in that woman's mind!
2007-01-15 18:02:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by hk5000 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
I dont't think I'm interested in anything she says. She sounds deadly dull to me and I pity Brad Pitt.
2007-01-15 18:05:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Beau Brummell 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
i've never heard that see paid for any of her kids. but i also think madonna did it more for the publicity than for the kid...but whatevs, they're all crazy celebrities so who knows why they do anything!
2007-01-15 18:07:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by duvalicious 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
You shouldn't believe everything you read in the papers they just want to sell as many as they can.
2007-01-15 19:34:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by molly 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
SHE NEVER PAID FOR HER KIDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND SHE LOVES HER KIDS ALL THE SAME!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU ALSO NEED TO LEARN TO SPELL ZAHARA'S NICK NAME IT IS JUST Z!!!!!!!!! I AM SO MAD THAT YOU SAID SHE WAS CLOSER TO MAD AND Z THAN SHI!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHATEVER YOU ARE READING IS TRASH THE REASON SHE BRIGS OUT MAD AND Z MORE IS BECAUSE SHI IS ONLY 7 MONTHS OLD!!!!!!!! IF YOU HAD HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE FALLOWING YOU WITH 3 YOUNG CHILDREN UNDER THE AGE OF 6 AND YOU HAD TO CARRY TWO OF THEM YOU WOLD LEAVE THE YOUNGEST AT HOME TO!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU NEED TO GET A LIFE AND STOP PUTTING HER DOWN BECAUSE SHE WANTED TO GIVE THOSE TWO BEAUTIFUL INNOCENT CHILDREN A GOOD LIFE!!!!!!!!! Z WAS STARVINGIN ETHIOPIA AND MAD HAD NO PARENTS IN CAMBODIA!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-01-15 18:17:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jessie 2
·
1⤊
5⤋