ok first why have people shortened his name to just intials he was a great man give him the credit of saying his name. my second question is derieved from watching his speech. whos going to be the great mexican speaker to bring them "freedom". just curious any one know who it could be and do you think that the speaker will speak english or spanish.
2007-01-15 09:17:05 · 12 answers · asked by marynew8 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
I'm sorry but saying Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. is a mouthful. Why not MLK, we know who they mean? And for the rest of your statement...huh? Do you hear yourself?
2007-01-15 09:21:55 · answer #1 · answered by wrtrchk 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think the shortening of a name to initials is a sign of disrespect. John F. Kennedy's name was often shortened to JFK. It's just an abbreviated way of referring to someone.
Yes, Martin Luther King was a great man who died for a great cause. While we honor him, let's also hope that if anyone else speaks out for the cause of freedom, that he or she does not meet the same fate as Martin Luther King.
2007-01-15 17:32:11 · answer #2 · answered by gldjns 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it's an honor that people are so familiar with Dr. King that initials are enough for people to know what is meant. It's the same with JFK. It would be sad if you said, "MLK" and no one knew what you meant...or had to ask. As for the portion of your question about a great Mexican leader....you need to elaborate. "Bring them freedom" in their country or to assure them of proper equalities as they become citizens of the U.S...or some other aspect of freedom?
2007-01-15 17:28:31 · answer #3 · answered by DinahLynne 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I feel calling it MLK Day is derogatory. It does not make a person tired to call it 'Martin Luther King Day' with some degree of respect for him and the people whose rights he championed. More so if people are aware of the sensitivity involved.
Give it some more time. A redeemer may rise for others if they are oppressed.
2007-01-15 17:26:53 · answer #4 · answered by Ottawan-Canada 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
part 1) it's not insulting to call someone by their initials adn saying someone's full name is not a measure or show of respect, how you utilize what they gave to the world, is.
part 2) Cesar Chavez was a "great mexican [american] speaker" who helped improve conditions for farm workers and brought attention to issues affecting the Latino community
part 3) he spoke in English.
2007-01-15 17:36:37 · answer #5 · answered by ms. g 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everyone I know calls it Martin Luther KIng Day, saying the whole name.
2007-01-15 17:23:40 · answer #6 · answered by Caroline 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh who cares?!.....you all want in on everything don't you?! The racism on Mexicans are close to non-existent! There is no segregation between Mexicans and the rest of the world! GET A LIFE ALREADY!
2007-01-15 17:37:07 · answer #7 · answered by Trini-HaitianGrl81 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
we Southerners have our Confederate memorial day to honour our dead and our ancestors sacrifice.
The native Americans need a memorial day. also.
I appreciated what king stood for. I have gotten shivers up my spine listening to him. he reminded me of Gandhi while I heard him speak.
I do think it is proper to always say a persons full name out of respect.I come from an area where people will say hello and then say you first and middle name. or first and last name. not just your first name.when you shorten something its showing a definite lack of respect unless of course its The word Y'all, which means , you all.haha.
Peace... pray for peace...That is what he wonted.for us all. to come together in peace.
2007-01-15 20:39:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
lol good point and I just say mlk when i type but I say the whole name when i speak
2007-01-15 17:36:05 · answer #9 · answered by Tip :) 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, maybe cause he was a great leader and he made a big change.
2007-01-15 17:29:48 · answer #10 · answered by Sweet and Sassy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋