If liberals can see a correlation between Bush and hitler, can liberals see the correlation between?

Question

FDR and hitler or Stalin? If not, i recomend opening a text book instead of reading prisonplanet.com

sadly, John Doe is right, i was expecting more thumbs down for this one

Answer 1

No, to a liberal a Democrat is never wrong. Just like they cannot see the very socialist leanings of Pelosi, Boxer, Belafonte and Sheehan. Ah well

Answer 2

Few liberals or anyone else make a valid connection between Bush and Hitler. It's not there. Those who ask such questions here are, as you imply, ignorant of history. One may dislike Bush but there is no comparing him to the insane venality of Adolf Hitler.

Answer 3

any leader of any group, organization, tribe, anything can have correlations. the fact that they are the leader means they believe in the cause or group they represent. Any leader of any group would and should do anything they think is right for their country/group it is the ones that go to far and cause problems for other groups that should be stopped. However when those people that go to far are opposed they will always say its the opposition that is wrong. So it takes some rational thinking to see who is the real evil. its a shame some in this country have either no rational thinking or they believe the evil is in this country.

Answer 4

I do not even see how liberals can really see a correlation between Bush and Hitler.

If Bush were like Hitler, he would have opened up those nukes on the Middle East a long time ago.

Oh, and I'm pretty sure that FDR would have nuked Iran by now.

EDIT: I don't know about right, but Doe is certainly the grumpy old man today.

Answer 5

Hitler and Stalin were the same person, just on opposite sides of the table. If russia lost, Stalin would have been the all-time worlds baddest guy, not ol' adolf.

Answer 6

I'm not a fan of the Bush/Hitler comparison. I think it compartmentalizes what Bush is doing into "either he is or he isn't like him." However, I think there is value in noting what constitutes facism (which isn't limited to Hitler's exercise of same).

And talking about FDR and Hitler/Stalin, while perhaps an amusing historical exercise, doesn't really have any value.

Answer 7

I honestly did not think it was possible, but the questions (and answers) are actually getting exponentially stupider.

Thank God the Politics section of Yahoo Answers is not representative of the country as a whole.

There are still Americans who can think in terms of more than TWO options in any given situation.

This isn't a forum; it's a rant room.

When all is said and done, there's more said.......than done.

These exchanges have all the depth of a saucer of milk.

I realize you all must be enjoying yourselves ever so much, but this is all very, very sad.

Answer 8

Hitler was a devil and hell bound and evil and such,,,,but in the early days ,he pulled Germany from the ashes and his national socialist republic was not the evil that Hitler mutated it into after his racist crazy murderous ways of the devil warped his mind ,,more than it was already warped anyway,,,liberals do not make such mad comparisons as you say,,,but bush and the republican party are finished and should step aside to pelosi,,,,,and the lib Dem,s,,,,,next elections re-pubs are with no chance,,,at all ,,,,Stalin was always a murder,,,,,,bush is a liar and a IRAQ war starter,,,that's all,,,,,,civilian

Answer 9

People, when they have nothing factual or rational to say, resort to name calling. Liberals have nothing relevant or positive to say and their followers follow blindly and rarely have independent thoughts of their own, so they feel frustrated and have no other recourse except name calling.
Its like the old bully on the playground calling somebody fat. They have nothing else to say, otherwise they'd say it.

Anyone who compares any leader, dem or republican to Stalin, Hitler etc, immediately loses all credibility in my book, conversation over and I walk away from them. Thats proves to me they have nothing worthwhile to say and Anyone that ignorant and uneducated is wasting my oxygen...

Answer 10

i might argue that non secular fundamentalist are additionally "fooling themselves into believing in spite of they choose" simply by fact they choose their very own very own evaluations approximately how scripture must be interpreted particularly than accepting what's got here across by using organic revelation. Assuming that god certainly created the universe, and considering that scriptures do no longer factor any epistemological technique, that could propose that technology isn't something greater advantageous than the quantification of gods introduction for the point of expertise and study. yet what's revealed their is many times rejected if it particularly is going to ensue to conflict with very own evaluations concerning interpretations of scripture. the kind of conceitedness i detect to no longer be an occasion of "self assurance and accomplishment" yet organic egotistical bias of a egocentric guy or woman that believes they understand greater advantageous than god.

Answer 11

I don't need any textbook to tell me there is NO comparing FDR to Hitler. I was living those times and well aware of my surroundings. FDR was one of our greatest presidents whereas Bush will never achieve that standing IMO.