You conservatives is the reason why Usa has a messed up history full of warfare. Right wingers are thirsty for wars. So don't blame us for wanting peace. Okay what about after ww2? Usa was the ones starting conflicts or getting involved. The country was not smart enough to declare neutrality. Plus Usa would not have been in that mess had it declared neutrality even before ww1 but guess what the right wingers fought?
2007-01-15 08:14:54 · 14 answers · asked by kfk456 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Soooooo communism collapsed because of natural reasons.
2007-01-15 08:24:07 · update #1
You people don't get it HOW COME THE SWITZ SURVIVED AND THE SWEDES
2007-01-15 08:25:45 · update #2
yep if only we would have declared neutrality. man that sure would have made everything so much easier.... wow
i get that if someone doesn't stand up to TRUE EVIL in the world even the "neutral Swiss and swedes" would have been taken over. world politics isn't like playground games. you cant be touching home base and be safe from getting tagged.......
2007-01-15 08:22:24 · answer #1 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
I truly imagine once each and each facet have some effective leaders on the helm, the bickering will be very much decreased. very last administration had some genuine yahoos - and that i'm not even speaking about Dubya. My in effortless words genuine pink meat with him replaced into that he picked some genuine snakes for advisors (truly Cheney and Rumsfeld). Had he picked some extra effective, a lot less conflict-hungry assistants i'm confident his administration should be regarded at slightly in yet in a special way than it truly is now. Jury's nonetheless out on Obama. His administration has finished a large number of not something interior the previous 2/3 of this 12 months. would not seem too good interior the forseeable destiny, both. both activities are finished of incompetent, self-serving jackals who probable don't have any organisation retaining public workplace interior the first position. i'm confident that is been that way for a lengthy time period, notwithstanding that is by no skill been extra obtrusive than it truly is immediately. i recognize it could be blasphemy, yet i in my opinion kinda go away out the Clinton administration. bill would were a snake who did a piss-undesirable job of controlling his own existence, yet a minimum of he replaced into able to operating the country.
2016-11-24 19:43:52 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neutrality in the face of WWII?
I think that's pretty much what France and England initially tried.
Are you serious?
Do you really think that Hitler and his demented ideology would have stopped after crushing all of the European nations and stayed on his own side of the Atlantic? Get real.
If you think you are intellectually up to it, you can argue with Albert Einstein's logic:
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of the people who do evil, but because of the people who look on and do nothing."
2007-01-15 08:31:47 · answer #3 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
you are an idiot if you think "neutrality" is the way to go in such cases as WW1. Did you not hear why we entered the war? Germany told Mexico it would help get the lands back that america "stole" so america entered it. They should have entered sooner
2007-01-15 08:26:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
OMG. i don't even know what to say to you.
you would rather scream that we're neutral than to go to war to stop a mad man who killed 6 million people? < note, we didn't go to war to stop it, we only joined the war when WE got hit. sounds familiar don't it?
the problem with people now is, noone believes anymore that anything is worth fighting for. well i'm here to tell you that there is. i'd rather die free and fighting scum like hitler and bin laden than lay down next to you and look the other way while they rape and enslave the rest of the human race.
2007-01-15 08:33:50 · answer #5 · answered by political junkie 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If we hadn't been involved in WWI & WWII, you'd be speaking German & paying homage to the Furher.
Any one who believes we should have stayed out of WWI and WWII needs to study a little history.
For evil to prosper requires only that good men remain silent.
Sometimes you have to fight for what is right, period.
Our leaders back then understood that.
Bush understands that.
Too bad you don't.
-
No Communism collapsed because we made them spend themselves into bankruptcy, they were already morally bankrupt.
Their state run economy couldn't keep up with our market based economy.
2007-01-15 08:24:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
You do know we were neutral prior to WWII, and the left wing got us into that war (and truthfully we needed to be in that one). The left made the UN which has been using us as its private army for years. Oh yea, let's not for get Kosovo and Mogadishu under Clinton. You facts are greatly scewed.
2007-01-15 08:22:54 · answer #7 · answered by JFra472449 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
I'm really glad you posted this question because I really enjoyed reading all the answers. I hope you did too, and also learned something. If our school system still taught American history, you would not have had to post you question here; you would already have your answer. So it's not really your fault. (By the way, FDR was hardly a conservative!) Thanks again!!
2007-01-15 10:28:09 · answer #8 · answered by Pete 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually, it was the Japanese who got the US into WWII. If Pearl Harbor had never happened, there's no way Roosevelt would've had the support needed to delcare war on the Fascists and Britain would probably have fallen sometime in the mid 1940's if not sooner.
2007-01-15 08:25:43 · answer #9 · answered by John S 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
When will people wake up to the fact that if you attack us,we are coming after you and taking names later.Bottom line,dont screw with the USA and we wont mess with you.
2007-01-15 08:23:05 · answer #10 · answered by jnwmom 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋