No the Bratt is liable
2007-01-15 07:45:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I don't know legally but if it were a logical world, then the pupil would be working in the service of the teacher and staying after school to re-pay the debt. Maybe things like mowing the teacher's lawn or walking their dog or something that would teach them responsibility. A student should NEVER deliberately damage a teacher's property. Also, suspension would be in order as well along with a 2,000 word essay on "Why it is wrong to damage and violate the property of another".
That is what SHOULD happen.
2007-01-15 15:53:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by KD 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Welll strangely I tend to disagree with all the aforegoing answers, if the teachers car was parked in a school car park, and it was damaged during school hours, meaning the student should have been under supervision and therefore the responsibility of the education authority, who one should suppose that all things,people under the auspices of the authority during school time should be covered by insurance. If everything is as mentioned and you're not getting satisfaction, go to Citizens Advise Bureau. I may be wrong but give it a try.
2007-01-15 15:55:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately, no. The student is liable and can be charged with destruction of property and can face time for that. If the student has a device that is not allowed on school property, there is another additional charge on top of that as well. Both charges are felonies.
2007-01-15 16:49:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by misswoodstockvateach 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. The school is not liable. Anyone who parks on school property is doing so at their own risk. Most schools have signs posted in their parking lots stating this.
2007-01-15 15:52:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would think the parents of the student are if he/she deliberately damages the teachers car. Maybe your insurance will cover this.
2007-01-15 15:50:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it doesn't matter whos car it was or where it was parked the pupil and untimately the childs parents are held responsible and will have to pay for the repairs to be completed.
2007-01-15 15:46:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by tucksie 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Nope. The student is responsible, and then the parents are responsible for the student. The parents can actually get arrested and charged for such things. Even if the parents weren't there, they are responsible for what their children do until they're 18.
2007-01-15 15:46:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by sdkramer76 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
Sounds like you should be contacting local law enforcement. They will tell you what charges may be placed against the individual for such property damage.
2007-01-15 15:49:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
i would think that student is responsible, however, if you cna't prove who the student is, then i would be inclined to think the vehicle owner's insurance would take care of it as "vandalism".
however, if the parking lot is attended and gated, then the owner could most likely get the school to foot the bill for repairs.
take care and good luck.
2007-01-15 15:47:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by joey322 6
·
0⤊
0⤋