I DO theres no evidence linking them to any crimes i think that lady was hoping the family would settle with her and she could make some quick money to bad she messed with the wrong families....
2007-01-15 07:28:55 · 14 answers · asked by Chet P 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
This case is a perfect example of exactly why Americans and the rest of the world need to stop convicting people through the media. Just because the police make and arrest, or just because some D.A. brings up charges on someone and maybe even gets an indictment handed down on them does not mean they are guilty. Wait unlt an actual Jury gives its verdict.
2007-01-16 12:13:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think these guys beyond any reasonable doubt are absolutely positively 100% F****n INNOCENT!!!! in my own personal quote "I mean seriously, if you can't trust a DUKE lacrosse player who can you trust." I think there might have been a little sign of money in the womens mind
2007-01-15 19:10:56 · answer #2 · answered by booma212 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Innocent except for hiring a stripper who then tried to make a quick buck off of false accusations. Her story keeps changing.
2007-01-15 07:32:49 · answer #3 · answered by Bad Kitty! 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
looks like they are only guilty of making a bad choice by hiring a pathetic loser as a stripper.
how many men's dna did they swab off of her? and NONE of it matched any of the duke players. it's ridiculous that these guys had to put their life on hold for this long. i hope they can salvage something out of all this.
2007-01-15 07:32:58 · answer #4 · answered by curious_One 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think they're all spoiled little punks who of course did something "out of line" to the stripper. But, i think the stripper probably knew what she was doing and was prolly trying to get a payoff or something.
I was about to vomit watching the duke players families on that news show- your boys are little angels-yeah right!
and why did they show the girl had a history of mental problems like it was a smoking gun- does that mean she could not have been raped!?
but yes, nifong is an idiot, and the boys can't be held w/o evidence.
2007-01-15 07:40:20 · answer #5 · answered by Lane 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
To my way of thinking, although they probably didn't rape that woman, they invited this trouble upon themselves by hiring a stripper to their college residence. I understand there is little the school can do since it was off campus housing, but they have brought shame on that school, and I think the school should take some action against them. Those little pricks have probably the cost that school tons of money in terms of lost enrollment/tuition dollars and attorney's fees etc just so they could get a stripper.
2007-01-15 07:36:19 · answer #6 · answered by melouofs 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Considering how many times the accuser has changed her story. I'm surprised the trial is still going on.
2007-01-15 07:46:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I do also! I heard there were videos of two of them going to an ATM machine at the time she said, and there are also phone records showing a phone calls she made during the alleged "rape"
2007-01-15 07:32:16 · answer #8 · answered by bad_sects 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There are consequences to unChristianlike behavior. They are guilty of underage drinking, having a party contrary to University and team rules, they exploited a woman for prurient interests. Guilty of a crime? Probably not. Innocent? Hardly.
2007-01-15 07:32:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
She sounds mentally unstable. She should get help. There is no dna evidence linking them to her so uh, i guess they are innocent.
2007-01-15 07:38:38 · answer #10 · answered by INFINITE CONSCIOUSNESS 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋