should the united nations have more power over us?

Answer 1

Absolutely not.

Answer 2

Russia had this ensue, China will come on difficult time also. the U. S. is going to come back conveniently to greatness. The markets are literally not experiencing any self assurance and so the those which have a ton of money are treading water until eventually self assurance is in sight and we've a longtime bottom. authorities is going to artwork on the infrastructure and draw down peoples money reserve presented they don't make investments. the entire plan will commence quick and run at correct speed for type of six months provide or take 3 then there'll be yet another adjustment by technique of the right of Obama's first time period issues will be searching up. No issues are going to be in simple terms high-quality. i desire we do not go the conflict direction to restore nationwide direction.

Answer 3

The problem with the UN is that 5 countries hold the right of veto over anything it does, so that the UN cannot do anything that would benefit the people of the world if it would harm the interests of one of those 5 countries.

The UN should be replaced with a democratically elected World Parliament, elected by the people of the world, with representatives elected to constituencies that span national borders so that powerful countries *cough*america*cough* can't threaten withdrawal of aid etc if they don't do what that powerful country wants. Global mechanisms that control war, peace, trade and development must be removed from the hands of the minority rich and put into those of truly representative democratic bodies.

(May I recommend the book below for more info)

Answer 4

If you underestimate the power of the United Nations, they are doing their job well. And yes, it is well known that the UN is anti-American. It's founding father was none other than Soviet Communist spy Alger Hiss. They have shown us no more than a pension for corruption (Oil for Food Scandal) and an abuse of power (UN "peace keepers" charged in numerous rape cases). They support disarmament as well as dismiss religion. They parade their UN Charter around like it was the 10 Commandments. If we seceded more power to the UN, they could be enabled to send U.S. troops to a foreign war under a foreign command. Ignorance is not bliss. . . .

Answer 5

Should boiled potatoes use a snorkle while driving?

Your question is entirely non-sequitar.

The U.N. was designed as a forum for world leaders and/or their delegates, embassadors and emmisaries to meet to discuss issues and resolve complaints.

All the UN does is issue numbered "resolutions", they're not supposed to have ANY power or authority aside from what the component members agree to on any given matter.

The UN is supposed to be a Eunich when it comes to giving birth to any action. They simply are a cephalization point, not a sentient government of any kind.

It has long worn out it's credibility, and should be dissolved.
.

Answer 6

You can't ask that question when the US has enough military might to potentially take on the rest of the world. Power of that magnitude is never given up peacefully.

In response to what someone else posted: The UN is not anti-US, rather the US government is very anti-UN. The US only seems to recognize the authority of the UN when it supports the US position.

Answer 7

I could think of nothing worse than giving more power to that bunch of financially corrupt second rate has-beens from third world countries.

John Bolton was correct - take away the top 12 floors of UN Towers and no-one would notice the difference.

The UN should be abolished and all the scrounging "snouts in the trough" do-gooders" sent back home.

Answer 8

NO! they should not have any power over the U.S, what kind qf power do they have now? Did they do any thing in Rawanda or Danfur? Heck no! they are a bunch of 3rd. world country's who have as much trouble getting along with each over as our Rep.and Dem.s do. they all have the same idea, whats in it for me-how can I stay in power over the little people.

Answer 9

It should have more power over evil military dictatorships like Burma. At present it cannot intervene in a countries' internal affairs however bad things are.

Answer 10

That's not the point of the UN
it is supposed to be a collection of states where each one has its own sovereignty and each state votes to decide what is best for the world

Answer 11

are you crazy, im form a war divided west african country and let

me tell you, the U.N. Sucks. The U.N.is just a platform for Big

powers to control the world.