English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

I detest Bush, as for being a puppet, he is really too stupid to follow orders, which is the reason that he was a draft dodger. I like Israel though...does that make me a puppet? I think that people, like certain countries in the Middle East, that are stupid enough to attack Israel without recognizing the consequences, should be puppets.

Get real, Israel has more intelligence officers in most Middle Eastern governments, than any specific Middle Eastern Country has at any given time. They fought off 8 ME countries in 11 days, and blew you guys away, and yet they still keep coming back...that implies extreme stupidity and you guys are getting just what you ask for...

2007-01-15 06:54:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

I have a question to respond to this question. What does George Bush sending troops to Iraq have to do with Jewish nationalism? No Israelis are going. No land will be given to Israelis. Israelis are not doing anything in Iraq, and the war is not benefiting them. So I ask, what does a fight between Iraqis and Americans have to do with Jewish freedom? Nothing!

Not every problem in the middle east has to do with Israel. People like you just hate Jews so much that you'll try to connect us with everything you don't like. It's blatantly racist.

2007-01-16 09:41:01 · answer #2 · answered by MaryBridget G 4 · 0 1

I have an puppet George Bush. Got it for Christmas. Think I'll take it back and exchange it for something more useful.

2007-01-15 06:55:38 · answer #3 · answered by Kwan Kong 5 · 1 0

Hey ! Stop calling Bush names. I could deliver a few very good ones to you. You sound like a Muslim who hates not only Israel but all Christians as well. It says so in the Qu'ran, right? Bush is not a puppet. He is a poor guy who is over his head with his Arab politics.

2007-01-15 19:54:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Ya - that's humorous to work out all those "help our troops" issues on the lower back of peoples' automobiles - yet our troops have been denied weapons and armor and leave and rotation - and while they get homestead they're denied scientific help and so one and so on. individuals are many times finished idiots - they only decide to look like they help troops - oftentimes they don't care. The conflict does not touch them - they only desire their tax rebate verify.

2016-10-07 05:02:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes America sponsers the Israeli terrorists.

2007-01-15 06:50:34 · answer #6 · answered by BRITS OUT 2 · 0 3

As a christian, i feel its my duty to lay my life down for the good of israel. god's prophecies in the bible could be disrupted by the devil if israel is not kept safe. without our tax dollars and soldiers fighting for israel, the rapture may never happen and evil could prevail.

2007-01-15 06:58:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

America must do whatever is necessary to rid the world of people like you.

2007-01-15 07:02:49 · answer #8 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 1 3

What in the blue f^ck are you blathering about?

2007-01-15 06:50:53 · answer #9 · answered by Chicken Jones 4 · 3 0

Now that most Americans no longer believe in the war, now that they no longer trust Bush and his Administration, now that the evidence of deception has become overwhelming, we might ask: How come so many people were so easily fooled?

Americans need to know history that is honest about the past. If we don't know that history, then any President can stand up to the battery of microphones, declare that we must go to war, and we will have no basis for challenging him. He will say that the nation is in danger, that democracy and liberty are at stake, and that we must therefore send ships and planes to destroy our new enemy, and we will have no reason to disbelieve him.

Our present leaders bombard us with phrases like "national interest," "national security," and "national defense" as if all of these concepts applied equally to all of us, colored or white, rich or poor, as if General Motors and Halliburton have the same interests as the rest of us, as if George Bush has the same interest as the young man or woman he sends to war.

Surely, in the history of lies told to the population, this is the biggest lie. In the history of secrets, withheld from the American people, this is the biggest secret: that there are classes with different interests in this country. To ignore that-not to know that the history of our country is a history of slaveowner against slave, landlord against tenant, corporation against worker, rich against poor-is to render us helpless before all the lesser lies told to us by people in power.

The deeply ingrained belief-no, not from birth but from the educational system and from our culture in general-that the United States is an especially virtuous nation makes us especially vulnerable to government deception. It starts early, in the first grade, when we are compelled to "pledge allegiance" (before we even know what that means), forced to proclaim that we are a nation with "liberty and justice for all."

If your starting point for evaluating the world around you is the firm belief that this nation is somehow endowed by Providence with unique qualities that make it morally superior to every other nation on Earth, then you are not likely to question the President when he says we are sending our troops here or there, or bombing this or that, in order to spread our values-democracy, liberty, and let's not forget free enterprise-to some God-forsaken (literally) place in the world. It becomes necessary then, if we are going to protect ourselves and our fellow citizens against policies that will be disastrous not only for other people but for Americans too, that we face some facts that disturb the idea of a uniquely virtuous nation.

These facts are embarrassing, but must be faced if we are to be honest. We must face our long history of ethnic cleansing, in which millions of Indians were driven off their land by means of massacres and forced evacuations. And our long history, still not behind us, of slavery, segregation, and racism. We must face our record of imperial conquest, in the Caribbean and in the Pacific, our shameful wars against small countries a tenth our size: Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, Afghanistan, Iraq. And the lingering memory of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It is not a history of which we can be proud.

George Bush, in his Inaugural Address on January 20, 2005, said that spreading liberty around the world was "the calling of our time." Years before that, in 1993, President Bill Clinton, speaking at a West Point commencement, declared: "The values you learned here . . . will be able to spread throughout this country and throughout the world and give other people the opportunity to live as you have lived, to fulfill your God-given capacities."

What is the idea of our moral superiority based on? Surely not on our behavior toward people in other parts of the world. Is it based on how well people in the United States live? The World Health Organization in 2000 ranked countries in terms of overall health performance, and the United States was thirty-seventh on the list, though it spends more per capita for health care than any other nation. One of five children in this, the richest country in the world, is born in poverty. There are more than forty countries that have better records on infant mortality. Cuba does better. And there is a sure sign of sickness in society when we lead the world in the number of people in prison-more than two million.

A more honest estimate of ourselves as a nation would prepare us all for the next barrage of lies that will accompany the next proposal to inflict our power on some other part of the world.

2007-01-15 09:01:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers