English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It would be 202 contestants competing for 1 billion dollars. Probably will have to extend the 39-day period to 3 months. Wouldn't that make good reality tv?

2007-01-15 05:41:30 · 4 answers · asked by xander 5 in Entertainment & Music Television

4 answers

They already HAD a Survivor All-Stars. Boston Rob & Amber were the final two, and she won. A pox on both of them. The Survivor you propose would be way too big, way too expensive, and way too long.

Wait for Amazing Race All-Stars, next. I'll root for The Hippies.

2007-01-15 05:50:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

That would be way to many people to keep track of. The first all stars sucked, I don't want another season of it.

2007-01-15 13:52:17 · answer #2 · answered by janeannpat 6 · 0 0

YES!! that would be great tv. i'd love 2 see johnny fairplay get his but whopped. and with that many great competiters, i'm sure he would. u outta b n tv programming. u'd hve a sure fire hit with this 1!!

2007-01-15 13:47:58 · answer #3 · answered by big foot 4 · 1 0

i would rather see washed up celebrities fight for a bag of rice instead.....

2007-01-15 13:47:50 · answer #4 · answered by ♠ JƏSSƏ'S GiRL ♠ 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers