English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

...tuplets screaming for you to feed them?

I think sextuplets would be a handful myself. One baby at a time is plenty.

2007-01-15 05:22:17 · 33 answers · asked by ? 6 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

33 answers

Yahoo. Yeah. Definitely, definitely Yahoo.

2007-01-15 05:33:28 · answer #1 · answered by Paintspinner37 3 · 1 0

Probably Yahoo, since I can do it at work and stay on as long as I want and with so many people. Can't really do that with sex

tuplets bothering you.

2007-01-15 05:27:59 · answer #2 · answered by evilcharm1 3 · 1 0

Yahoo

2007-01-15 05:25:21 · answer #3 · answered by Chewie 7 · 1 0

Love the way you fooled us with the positioning of your question! So now I am going to pick "be on Yahoo!"

God bless anyone who does have sextuplets!

2007-01-15 05:28:19 · answer #4 · answered by Adios 7 · 2 0

Both, considering sex will only last less then 5-10 minutes so I would get back on yahoo. LOL

2007-01-15 05:29:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I wouldn't want more than one baby at a time and I'd rather be on yahoo than taking care of any kids...

2007-01-15 05:26:57 · answer #6 · answered by trishay79 4 · 1 0

If you have sex tuplets would your Boobs get sextimes bigger ?
YAHOO any day over screaming sextuplets

2007-01-15 05:28:23 · answer #7 · answered by LCee 5 · 1 0

Yahoo of course

2007-01-15 06:07:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

well I have 19 month old twins and they're not too bad

but I think I would definitely take Yahoo over sextuplets

I don't think I have enough patience left to deal with that!

2007-01-15 05:28:32 · answer #9 · answered by Patty O' Green 5 · 2 0

Sex...I hate Yahoo

2007-01-15 05:26:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers