Divisive both at the national and global levels.
2007-01-15 05:18:03 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well at first he was divisive, but over time, as more and more people realize what a diaster he is, we're becoming unified on that. See, he IS a uniter after all!
2007-01-15 05:22:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Bush has certainly tried to divide and conquer but as BEWFURD has explained, it has backfired on him. I am relieved! Finally, Democrats and Republicans are beginning to be interested in the same things.
I think Bush will go down as one of the worst presidents in history and that we will make great strides in this country never to let anything like Bush happen again.
I, for one, am an advocate for extensive background checks on anyone throwing their hat in the ring to run for public office. If too much information is unavailable or hidden, the person is not allowed to run for office....rich or not. If a person can not qualify for a job teaching in an American school or even driving a bus due to a past record, they certainly should not be allowed to be president, governor, or even county dog catcher. People should not have to rely on the opponent to bring out the mud on a candidate...mud slingers are seldom believed anyway even if the accusations are accurate.
Lets unite on the question of HOW ARE WE GOING TO STOP THIS FROM HAPPENING AGAIN???
Thank you Bush for bringing the public together again.
2007-01-15 13:33:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Teddy Roosevelt was pretty high on the divisive scale.
Remember the Battleship Maine? Looks like he had it sunk so he would have an excuse to attack Spain.
So 1902 and 2002 is not much of a change. Both cheerleaders both Skull&Bones members.
Go big Red Go
2007-01-15 13:29:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
President George Bush is an accomplished man.
He graduated Yale, flew fighter jets and ran a successful major league baseball team.
He was governor of Texas and was re-elected by a wide margin.
He won acclaim from liberals for his ability to work with them.
It wasn't until he reached the poisoned air of Washington DC and the National Liberal Biased Media that he suddenly became the liberals favorite enemy.
2007-01-15 15:12:25 · answer #4 · answered by Feelsgood 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That Hugo Chavez guy comes to mind.
2007-01-15 13:37:15 · answer #5 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, Herbert Hoover. He was the ultimate fall guy, but a great leader.
2007-01-15 13:23:10 · answer #6 · answered by Chicken Jones 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Abraham Lincoln,comes to mind,or is the Civil War not recent enough..?
2007-01-15 13:24:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
MORE divisive president? Yeah, his name is BILL CLINTON. He drove us apart like no other.
2007-01-15 14:10:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
http://politicalarithmetik.blogspot.com/2006/03/how-low-can-approval-go.html
He actually has a majority supporting him from his own party, but the opposition party unsupporting is a record.
2007-01-15 13:25:51 · answer #9 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bewford's answer is perfect.
2007-01-15 13:22:59 · answer #10 · answered by Susan S 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋