This is a question for non elvis fans and those who are capable of being objective . All rock stars are considered good looking by their fans no matter what they look like . I am talking about a young elvis here of course. Please gives marks out of 10 for sheer hansomeness?.
2007-01-15 04:23:25 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
He was alright when he first came out but I have never found him drop-dead gorgeous. I give him a 4 without his voice and a 6 with his voice.
2007-01-15 04:27:52 · answer #1 · answered by jfoxie 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Elvis Presley
2016-05-24 06:35:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The young Elvis? Definitely perceived as a "10" in those days. I was a teenager at the time so I remember. But personally I would have given him just a "5" on the attractive scale for men. You see, it was his "image" that his fans considered "real gone". Take that away and you're left with an average looking guy with soft features.
2007-01-15 06:54:37 · answer #3 · answered by gugenheim84 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
6
2007-01-15 04:53:59 · answer #4 · answered by Me 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
For his time, he was one of the best looking men around, partly because of his voice and sexual image, but also because of his hair. I am only 16 right now and I am obsessed with everything about him. For the time, he was a definite 10, as of right now, I'd still say he is a 10 but others would give him around a 7. He's not what the kids these days consider "hot".
2015-06-13 09:04:52 · answer #5 · answered by Amy 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's a subjective thing. Personally, I thought he was very handsome and sexy at the height of his career, with those baby blue eyes and 1000 watt smile. He actually had light brown or blond hair. It was dyed black which made him even more striking in appearance. Check out some of his technicolor movies such as Viva Las Vegas. He was definitely at the top of his game in this film and having Ann Margret as his co-star really ignited his sex appeal. It was rumored at the time that they were a hot item. It was ashame what happened to him towards the end of his career with his drug and obesity problems.
2007-01-15 04:52:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, during the time that he was alive & at the peak of his fame, he was 'rated' 10... imagine girls fainting just by looking at him and shaking his hand! But if he was a celebrity that has just emerge at this era, I think he will be 'rated' 3.5... coz' nowadays the hollywood image trend is very different from those days & fans have different expectations; in terms of looks & talent.
2007-01-15 04:34:06 · answer #7 · answered by JaneBond 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I can tell you ,my daughter-in-law is 26 and she says she doesnt think he was good looking at all.I on the other hand,being older and all ,think he was very good looking for that time.You got to remember this was mid 50's and we really hadn't seen anyone else that PRETTY.(I was born in 53 so i started liking him in early 60's)He was our "Danny Zuko".(From the movie "Grease")
2007-01-15 04:56:35 · answer #8 · answered by GranGran 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he was pretty handsome back when he first started doing his thing.
I would give him a 7 out of 10.
2007-01-15 04:32:00 · answer #9 · answered by KatyScarlett 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I say he was a 10. He was still good looking, I thought in his later days.
2007-01-15 04:41:18 · answer #10 · answered by Yomi 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋