Why should post poll alliance be accepted? as the voter has no say but to accept it?

Question

Why should post-poll alliance be valid and accepted by the Election commission as the actual voter is not involved then at all in the decision making process as the alliance may suit only the elected candidate who also out of compulsion has to make certain compromises which may be against the voters interest too? As the elected candidate is only interested to seek some powerful position at that stage he is not bothered about the voters' opinion who have elected him. Thus the voter's wish or purpose for voting him/her may not be fulfilled. Voters feel cheated but then its too late. As they have to wait for another term of 5 years approx by then huge damage is done. Will the EC ban post-poll alliance? or frame out certain norms to safeguard the voters interests?

Answer 1

You have asked the Very Important question.
This post polls alliance should be banned as this alliance is been not made for the benefits of voters, and this type of alliance is made to just fool the voters. But none of the political party will asked to ban the post polls alliance. Every politician is making post polls alliance only for their own economical development.
There is no need to frame out certain norms to safeguard the voters interests.
I am fully in support of your view to ban the post polls alliance.

Request for other readers: Please comment on this question to show your support.

Answer 2

after the polling day voters either have no say in the governance.