Interesting I was just thinking about the first paragraph of the declaration of independence. That those that can fight against tyrants should. Our government is being destroyed it does not work. Their is to much bureaucracy and no one with the balls to actually implement dramatic change. The only way we can survive. I saw we just tell China to wipe all our debt off or by 2010 we stop importing form them.
2007-01-15 04:12:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by slickny8111 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
The Revolution Is Not being Televised! If Senate Bill 1, Section 220 of the Ethics Bill passes tomorrow, you will not have redress or a voice in government. Yes, It is a violation of the Bill of Rights and the United States Constitution! Will they be Impeached? By whom? It is the Axis of Just as Evil! What's Next?
They Do not want to hear Your opinions on same sex marriages, Taxes, privacy, Iraq, Illegal Immigration, securing the Borders etc...etc...etc...
This will be the priviledge of Large Corporations and Special Interest Groups and Highly Paid Political Activists, in it for the Money! That's a Fact! None of the major braodcasters are telling either!
Call 1800-459-1887 or diretly 202-224-3121 Before it is too late. Roust them at home, their home states and Washington, D.C. Wake up people!
http://www.politicalwatchdog.com
http://www.senate.gov
http://www.afa.com
http://www.whitehouse.gov/comments
2007-01-15 16:02:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sassy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
What do you mean by revolution? If Senate Bill 1, Section 220 Passes you will have no Free Speech under the Moot Point United States Constitution and you will no longer be able to contact your elected officials about anything! Illegal aliens, civil and human rights, taxes or the way they conduct themselves in business. Only Large Corporations and Special Intrerest Groups will Have that priviledge! How do you like those DEMONcrats and TRASHINISTAS now? Is this proposal revolutionary enough?
2007-01-15 12:21:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Stormchaser 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Depends on what ya mean by "revolution". If you mean is it time for a third political party, I'd say yes, because our two major parties have become like the Crips and the Bloods, just two criminal gangs fighting over turf. Jeez, they even fly the same colors! What, ya never heard of blue states and red states?
2007-01-15 12:16:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by texasjewboy12 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
It's only time for a revolution when there is no other way to change the government. We've already neutralized Bush for the most part since November, now we need to wait until Nov 2008 to get rid of him and his misguided party completely.
2007-01-15 12:21:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Yahoo Will Never Silence Me 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
the president has already said that he flat-out doesn't care what the voters think about his plans. he has literally said that no matter what the polls say, or his approval ratings say, he will not be swayed. in fact, he has gone so far as to deem himself the "educator in chief," (yes, literally... sweet, sweet irony) and says he's going to teach us all why he is right and we are wrong.
you're gonna try and fight that? good luck.
remember harrison bergeron. no matter what your personal strength, or how much the masses support you, the system is too strong to be rocked by any individual.
2007-01-15 12:17:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Revolution for what? Are you not happy with living in the US?
2007-01-15 12:12:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Daniel 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
You need to secure the support of the armed forces or you won`t get anywhere. The government will introduce marshal law and shoot you where you stand.
2007-01-15 12:17:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by dingdong 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
No. It's what the government WANTS so they can utilize foreign troops already on U.S. soil to implement martial law!...
http://www.global-conspiracies.com/fema_concentration_camps.htm
2007-01-16 14:18:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes. to end corruption and give people the power back in government. politics run by lobbys,corporations and other countries people is not representing the will of the people or their interests.
jefferson said it was a good idea.
sadly people are too busy blaming each other and their partys to see that both parties are corrupt
2007-01-15 12:22:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by J Q Public 6
·
2⤊
2⤋