Consider the debate around the 1920s Prohibition Era with the call for legalization of marijuana for casual use and the changing legal limits for alcohol today. Identify similar issues for each. What lessons from Prohibition can be applied to actions to legalize marijuana today?
2007-01-15 03:57:48 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Gangsters getting rich then drug barons now - see a pattern? I wonder where all the money is going?
2007-01-15 04:06:10 · answer #1 · answered by airmonkey1001 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are some definite parallels, all of which I'm certain will be discussed here. So, here's a difference.
Generally speaking, more people want to drink alcohol than smoke marijuana. Drinking is so universal and has been for centuries and centuries that prohibiting it is something society couldn't support.
A lot of people want to smoke marijuana, but not nearly as many as want to drink alcohol. That's why society hasn't crumbled under the marijuana ban. It's still considered a subculture rather than being pervasive.
2007-01-15 04:07:11 · answer #2 · answered by Dave R 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
evaluation of alcohol prohibition, more suitable constructive huge-spread as temperance, and your so-referred to as "marijuana prohibition" does no longer provide a lot appropriate assistance to help what you likely favor to finish, that being the legalization of marijuana. first of all, using marijuana under no circumstances experienced the widely used, go-cultural, and criminal acceptance that alcohol did earlier to its prohibition. The temperance move advanced out of countless a lengthy time period of adventure with the use and abuse of alcohol on a society-huge factor, most popular at last to the Volstead Act, which prohibited manufacture and interstate commerce of alcohol. The Volstead Act grow to be under no circumstances truly a finished prohibition of alcohol besides. It provided for abode manufacture and use. to boot to, the temperance move grow to be truly more suitable of a political move, championed noticeably by using females and "anti-salooners". there grow to be even a patriotic flavor to temperance even as the nationwide Brewer's association made the blunders of associating itself with the German-American Alliance earlier to international conflict I. on the different hand, marijuana has really been unlawful from the start and for this reason hasn't ever been allowed to exist in an ecosystem ensuing in its "Prohibition", for this reason the similarity of subject matters you're inquiring for are few. operating example, an excellent concern with alcohol prohibition grow to be its impact on interstate commerce and its effect upon the monetary equipment. This hasn't ever existed for marijuana. you also factor out "replacing criminal limits for alcohol immediately". i'm no longer certain what you advise by using this. Do you advise age of criminal intake, or blood alcohol tiers? If some thing both have replaced to point a transforming into intolerance of using alcohol. criminal age has risen and criminal B.A. tiers have dropped. So how would this help legalization of marijuana? hi there, the base line right it is that the Volstead Act tried to tame a monster which could no longer be constrained. lets LEGALIZE MARIJUANA to benefit an same LESSON? in trouble-free words a self-serving and sadistic fool would improve a monster to benefit it grow to be no longer controllable.
2016-10-31 04:12:50 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The primary difference between alcohol and marijuana, is the intended outcome. Alcohol can be used in moderation, without causing impairment, while marijuana can not.
2007-01-15 04:05:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
All attempts to prohibit vice have failed throughout history. No one learns anything from that.
2007-01-15 04:07:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋