Lemme see the candidates:
Bobby Lee - outstanding strategic thinker, beloved by his men and respected by his foes, if only he didn't blunder at Cemetery Ridge on July 3, 1863.
Uly Grant - doesn't take much tactical thinking for sledgehammer attacks, winning by attrition alone. He basically won the war for the North.
Bedford Forest - getting there 'firstest with the mostest' men was his motto, daring cavalry general for the South.
TJ - AKA Stonewall - best tactical general of the war, led from the front (which was his undoing). Had he been alive at Gettysburg, the course of the war would've been different.
Hancock - savior of Gettysburg (besides Colonel Chamberlain at Little Round Top - but he wasn't a general and Buford for holding the high ground in day 1). Hancocks leadership saved the day on the 1st two days, after the bungling Howard and death of Gen. Reynolds.
My favorite is TJ, for his victories in the Shenandoah Valley and flanking movement at Chancelorsville, which made his boss look good. Without TJ, Gen., Lee was exposed as a poor tactical commander, that and his small HQ staff....but that's another discussion.
Other Honorable Mention:
Jeb Stuart
Gen. Hood (southern army)
Longstreet
Sherman
Sheridan
2007-01-15 04:21:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Its not me Its u 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
protection stress management interior the yank Civil conflict become inspired by applying expert protection stress training and the tricky-earned pragmatism of command adventure. at the same time as no longer all leaders had formal protection stress training, the US protection stress Academy at West factor and the US Naval Academy at Annapolis created devoted cadres of expert officers whose information of protection stress technology had profound consequence on the habit of the yank Civil conflict and whose lasting legacy helped forge the traditions of the general U.S. officer corps of all provider branches.
2016-12-12 11:56:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋