intel quad core is the best
2007-01-15 03:04:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you're looking at pure, raw performance, then Intel's top-of-the-line Core i7-975 Extreme Edition beats the heck out of anything AMD makes. But, it's also $1000. So let's break it down by market. High-end Performance ($275+ processors): Intel is king here, with the wide range of its new Core i7 processors. AMD doesn't have anything that really matches it performance wise (and price wise, since the most expensive AMD Phenom II chip is $215) Mid-range Performance ($120 - $275) Intel has this one sewn up pretty well right now as well. The Core i5 range of processors offers better features and performance for not much more money. There are a couple Phenom II X4 processors that come close, but not close enough to win the crown. Low-end / Budget Performance (<$120) This is where AMD is still king. The only processors from Intel in this market are the now-aging Core 2 / Pentium Dual-Core chips. These are all Socket LGA 775, which is going bye-bye soon. When Intel releases its Core i3 chips, this may change quickly. Until then, AMD makes a quad-core Athlon II for around $100 that offers amazing performance for the price, an even cheaper Athlon II tri-core (with a slightly faster clock speed than the quad-core) that's a great proposition. There is a wide assortment of other Athlon II's and Phenom II's above, below, and between them. And the socket they're offered on, AM3, is relatively new and will be around for a while. AMD also has been committed to backwards compatibility for their newer sockets, as AM2 chips can be used in AM3 motherboards, and vice versa. So that means when their newer chips come out, you have a better chance of being able to upgrade just the CPU, rather than having to buy a new motherboard and possibly other components as well. If you're looking at building / purchasing a system soon, it would really help you to check out hardware benchmarking sites like the ones I've listed in the sources. The present generally unbiased reviews and benchmarks pitting the processors against others in their class / price range. Whatever your price range, you'll be able to make a fully informed decision that way.
2016-05-24 06:07:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both Intel & AMD processors are internaly CISC (Complex Instruction Set Computing) type of processors. But to some extent differ in their design. Based on my experience as an computer hardware service person for the past 7 years, i feel AMD dual core is good in realtime performance compared to Intel dual core when fixed with a matching motherboard.
2007-01-15 03:10:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by senthil 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Different company, different technologies, and AMD used to be the best. Now, I think Intel's Core 2 Duo is kicking anything AMD currently has out. It all depends on what you want to do. If you aren't going to be doing anything too hardcore, then I would go with AMD since they are solid chips and are usually less expensive.
2007-01-15 03:00:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kevin 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let me offer an analogy :
What's the difference between Porche & Ferarri ?
(depends on the specific model , right ...)
They are 2 independant companies who make CPUs.
They are both reliable & make some very powerful chips.
Best bang for the dollar comes via AMD.
Yes...some benchmarks show the Intel as faster in some apps by a 5 - 8 % margin .... is it worth the money ?
Not in my opinion ... odds are neither you nor I would notice the difference.
FYI ..Intel is more expensive not because they are better quality but because they have a much higher advertising budget to compensate for .... when's the last time you saw an "AMD Inside" ad anywhere ? ...LOL...
regards,
Philip T
2007-01-15 03:20:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Philip T 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Brand, haha its so differentdude, amd is usually cheaper than intel. amd and intel has different type of mother board. intel more responsif for multitasking. But its depends on type of each processor, so i can tell which best. I use intel, if you have enough money to afford intel, get it.
2007-01-15 03:03:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by maxiangelo 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Intel is the industry giant which, at times, tries to bully the market.
AMD is a little company in Texas that astounds everyone. For example, Intel and HP worked together to make the Itanium at greater than 1 GHz but were unable to accomplish this. Along comes little ole AMD with just such a chip.
AMD chips run a little cooler than Intel chips. For cutting edge chips, it is day to day who is the leader. But AMD is the little giant killer!
2007-01-15 03:17:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by williamh772 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Intel and AMD uses different technology. Intel is internally 64bit processor, but AMD is both internally and externally 64 bit. I think AMD is best, faster (though frequence is less) and cheap. AMD has latest SIMD technology. Best for gaming and graphic.
2007-01-17 18:25:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anjaneya 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Basically, there is not difference. It is pretty much the same technology, but manufactured by different companies. Both processors are equally good. If you are looking to save a little money, AMD processors are usually a little bit cheaper.
2007-01-15 03:01:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by j 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
AMD is the best,because suppose where ever we use intel's 2.6 processor,it works similar amd's 1.6 or 1.8 processor .
But, Amd processors works better in less humidity atmosphere.
2007-01-15 03:33:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by pravin0075 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
as for now intel core 2 duo is better,intel and amd processors have their own specialties
2007-01-15 05:03:35
·
answer #11
·
answered by pv_shah007 2
·
0⤊
0⤋