2007-01-15 02:40:38 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
To advance the homosexual and "men are not necessary" agenda of the radical Homosexual and Feminist Left. When kids are taught that a loving mom and dad are not necessary for a good life, good home and a solid family, it enforces the idea that we can do what feels good as opposed to what's right. It's taught to further the destruction of our social fabric in America and to advance hedonism and self-centered sexuality over responsibility.
2007-01-15 02:52:07 · answer #1 · answered by christopher s 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Why are they "not ready to take it"?
My g/f works in a kindergarten and one thing that is true is that some kids (not all) are really full of questions about "where babies come from?" or "where did I come from?" And if they live with, or see pictures of, puppies or kittens or baby farm animals, kids are not stupid ... they put things together and start asking about human reproduction.
As soon as a kid is old enough to ask some questions, that kid is old enough to be answered honestly (but in an age-appropriate way). There are lots of books, even for very young kids, that do this.
... By "not ready to take it" do you mean "not ready to do it"? If so, then I would say that the time a teenager is able to have sex is NOT the time to start teaching them about it. Trust me, by that time they have already gotten a lot of bad information from other kids. And if you think you can shelter them from exposure to sex in the media, then you must think you can keep kids watching "Thomas the Tank" until they're 15.
2007-01-15 10:53:17 · answer #2 · answered by secretsauce 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I was first taught about reproduction in class when I was 13 (and I already knew a lot about it anyway). And believe me, at 13 your are technically ready to perform it. So it's better to enlighten teens on that matter. Being ignorant is far more dangerous than having notions of human reproductive biology (it's far from being pornography).
2007-01-15 10:52:45 · answer #3 · answered by Loussaille 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends what you consider to be a young age. I started sex ed in grade 6 which was just in time to inform everyone about sexual dangers, and early enough to get the facts from someone other than peers.
I think every child age 11 and over should have a basic knowledge of sexual reproduction. It is part of science and a basic fact of life.
2007-01-15 10:51:54 · answer #4 · answered by bpbjess 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they are not ready to take it because at their age they arent aware of its vitality in the human world.
and at the age of a kid this is not impotant
they dont even have the developed organs at that time.they just need its summary as for them its enough and the real awareness should start from high school i mean teenage or adolsence.
2007-01-16 07:24:39 · answer #5 · answered by anshul s 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At least they learn something which is better than nothing.
I know this is one area where there might be some difficulty in teaching but keeping in mind the fact that this is what everybody has and all animals partake in it, the subject becomes comprehensible.
2007-01-15 11:13:18 · answer #6 · answered by Ishan26 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I also had to learn about this at a young age.
I guess they just want to keep kids aware of the danger factor (STDs). And why they should wait 'til marriage (abstinence and stuff).
Either way they will figure it out anyway, from their parents or their friends from school.
eventually, they will know.
=]
-Kenya
2007-01-15 10:46:47 · answer #7 · answered by marinescheerleader 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
for awareness
2007-01-16 05:03:39 · answer #8 · answered by vara l 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋