Why, or why not? Since the time of FDR, who was elected 4 times, US presidents have been limited to 2 terms,
2007-01-15 01:51:03 · 50 answers · asked by In Honor of Moja 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! He shouldn't even be here in the first place
2007-01-15 01:54:49 · answer #1 · answered by lemonz 2 · 5⤊ 6⤋
because of the fact i did not vote for him the 1st time or the 2d time. He has lied to us in extra techniques than any president has interior the previous. He has gotten us in a disastrous conflict. He has left us with the accountability of rebuilding a rustic lower back to three variety of sanity(Iraq), while its obtrusive we are chasing our tail. we've lost all our credibility as a international chief. while at one time we've been appeared as much as. If anybody replace into to run for a third time, i does not hesitate to vote for invoice Clinton lower back. inspect his checklist. He saved us out of an excellent mess in eastern Europe. Economically,we've been doing great! Bush is an egotistical maniac. i does not be shocked if Bush tries to make an replace allowing him to run a third term.
2016-10-07 04:42:55 · answer #2 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obviously, President Bush is limited to the two terms as dictated by a Constitutional Amendment. I wish an exception was made for him to run so that he can be defeated soundly before taking his place alongside Warren Harding and Herbert Hoover as three of the worst Presidents this country could have ever imagined. Would I vote for him if he could run, absolutely not.
2007-01-15 07:19:34 · answer #3 · answered by cliff 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Heavens no! How one man can make not only this country a mess, but the rest of the world too. His lies have made people fighting and arguing here, people believing all Muslims are evil, and that Iraq had something to do with 9/11 (which it did NOT). He cares little to none for the innocent lives his war is costing (our troops and Iraqis). He's a monster and he will be a very haunted man in his old age.
2007-01-15 02:50:41 · answer #4 · answered by mickeyg1958 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
It would depend on who he was running against. I don't agree with a lot that he has done but overall he has really done a lot despite what others may think and believe. He looks really tired and worn though so I think that even if a third term was an option that he himself wouldn't take it. Being President is exhausting and it might be nice to have a fresh face in office.
2007-01-15 01:58:49 · answer #5 · answered by Ms. H 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
I would vote for him with out question he is one the greatest presidents weave ever had he's just not best buds with the Media like Clinton was and none of his goods works have been published only bad. He cut government Devosit in half are economy dooing beter know than when the democrats had controle. The dmt's need to tel the secret of doing all this in 3 weeks the only difrence is gas has gone down in price,
2007-01-15 02:02:35 · answer #6 · answered by rocko33543 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Give me a "Hell,yeah!". I would, I think its kinda silly for everyone to blame the President for what goes on. I got it, the next time terrorists want to blow up a couple of skyscrapers, lets just give them any they pick out, and if they are populated by liberal Democrats we'll stand back and cheer(is that what you'd want to hear?). Seems we all want to forget what the fight is about as soon as it inconveniences us. Well, hey, this war is kinda getting in my way too(considering my brother is in Iraq). The business where I work is slow, all the prices are going up and I can get complaints about anywhere I go. So how about I whine on the web about it, huh?
2007-01-15 02:12:35 · answer #7 · answered by relaxed 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
No, I don't' think he is doing a very good job running the country.
He is so he!! bent on this war and won't admit failure and or leave the country. Now he wants to send 20,000 troops over there.
Its seems like the "relationships" with other countries are at their lowest. I remember see Clinton always on the news, visiting countries and keeping the peace.
I know this is so silly, but every time he speaks he sounds like a yo yo. He is always saying the most off the wall things. I am embarrassed for him at times. I just want to tell him, don't ad-lib just read what is on the teleprompter.
2007-01-15 01:58:23 · answer #8 · answered by Tabitha 4 · 6⤊ 4⤋
Nope. I haven't voted for him yet and I can't imagine anything could possibly get me to support that buffoon.
Anyway, how could he campaign? It would take him from New Hampshire to his opponents inauguration to get through his "old saying from Texas routine" if he added another verse.
There's an old saying in Kentucky, er uh or I know it's in Texas, um uh I think its in Kentucky. um er Fool me once, shame on uh duh doop u foom me once, shame on me, shame be twice uh er ................
and on into the third time around.
2007-01-15 04:14:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely!!! He is the best of the best. The man has done the best job under the circumstances. I dont think anyone else would have done any better...Republican Or Lib..
2007-01-15 02:05:36 · answer #10 · answered by PoliticallyIncorrect 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
HELL NO! hes no different than any other selfish dictator. hes done everything for his own reasons and has not once listened to the people. unless he rigs the election and runs again ill be shocked if he gets another term. hes killed america, everything he claims we stand for hes taken away and has made us look like bullys to every other country. hes used our coutnrys strength to make us look like greedy gods that wants everything and everyone to be like us. oh and another thing WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO CHASING BIN LANDEN?????? hmmm the whole reason we entered war in the first place and yet i havent heard the government mention him in OH............. YEARS NOW!
2007-01-15 02:04:54 · answer #11 · answered by toolate 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋