If what happened to IRAQ happened to the USA , would you be an INSURGENT?

Question

What if soldiers from a foriegn power was kicking in the doors to your house looking for insurgents?

What if a foriegn power bombed every major city in your nation, then captured your President and had him hanged by a puppet government they installed in Washington DC?

Then ...with the entire infrastructure of your nation destroyed...you are supposed to LOVE the nation that is responsible.

That is what the KNUCKLEHEAD American people expect of the IRAQI people.

If it happened to US......would you be an INSURGENT?

Answer 1

That is why the U.S. needs to cut its losses and leave before something worse happens,we did all we can do to try and help those people.
I don't know why the Republicans in power can't see the realities of what we are doing over there.
It is not up to us what kind of government Iraq chooses to have. It is none of our business.That goes against freedom of choice and everything that America stands for.
Hopefully ,someone with enough common sense will try and explain this to those that are in power now in the U.S. Bush will not listen to Congressman and Senators,they will be wasting their breath and Bush plans on using Executive privledge anyway,I think it might be a lost cause until the next Presidential election.

Answer 2

Insurgents ARE Iraqis. they are the human beings the U.S. kicked out of authorities and did not receives a fee off with information from the U.S. because they were contained in the bathtub party. i believe sorry for those Iraqis who've no money and no jobs. They turn to crime to help their households. I also sense sorry that Iraqis were at warfare, been invaded, been managed and lengthy previous by a lot suffering over numerous years. that's basically too undesirable they dont get the same advantages as American infantrymen do on the end of this operation.

Answer 3

I din't know if insurgent is the word I would usebut, I think I get your point.
It is my understanding that there has never been an occupying country that actually held on to a country by force.
I think about it this way. I another country invaded the united states I would fight to the end to try and repell them.
I and not a man who is looking for a fight but if you tried to take what is mine you would have one.
No matter what people might think the people of Iraq are no different.

I our government intends to stay in a country that does not whant us there. We better bring a lunch.

Answer 4

Hard to say. If it was a case where we were being "freed" from an awful dictator, I would be inclined to comply. I think it would be wonderful if Iraq held an election were the Iraqi people could vote on whether or not they want or need our help. If they voted "No" We pack up & get the he// out of there. That would end some of the arguing amongst Americans as to whether or not they want us there.

Answer 5

Your logic is skewed, if American was invaded the country that did the invading would not try to limit the damage done to our infrastructure they would not try avoid civilian casualties they would be totally ruthless like what we did to japan, so to answer your question there would not be any insurgents (by the way the correct term is terrorist not insurgents don't follow the media PC terminology)

Answer 6

Make sure you get the full context.

We be under a dicator who goes around wiping out whole towns.

Throws people into woodchippers.

The people who like him there are the targets of those army coming into the nation.

They let us have free elections, women get rights again, and those who did the killing are being hunted.

Now with a little more accuracy in your statement. Those would be the terrorist to be hunted down and kill.

Answer 7

Brilliant question!!!!

At face value, it is an excellent question for us all to ask ourselves. Digging deeper, however, it is important to understand that the country and its leader were horribly corrupt and the citizens were being held captive by a murderous dictator (and as much as you may hate Bush, it would be a stretch the compare the two.) But I do believe that we need to think in those terms, from time to time, in order to get a clearer picture of what is going on over there.

The 'collateral damage' is unacceptable, in my opinion - and that is where Americans should focus their attention. Timothy McVee used that term to explain the deaths of hundreds of innocent women and children in Oklahoma - and he learned that terminology and ideology from the time he served in the Persian Gulf. Why was it okay over there...and not on his home turf?

Answer 8

Of course YES. I´ll never accept foreigners sucking my oil, torturing my people and supporting a fake war in my country just for money and at the same time telling me that is for my liberty and democracy.

Answer 9

I wonder what we will be called when middle-class Americans rise against our government over illegal aliens invading our country!

Answer 10

Liberals would fight for freedom. Conservatives would side with whoever they thought represented the best financial investment opportunity. Fundamentalist Christians hate America enough to side with anyone who wants to destroy the US Constitution.