Is there a connection between pro-abortionists, slave owners, and Nazi's??

Question

The main argument for abortion is this: The fetus inside a woman's womb is not a person, therefore, it is OK to kill it. However, do you remember what the argument for slavery was? "Blacks are not people, so they can be our slaves". The Nazi's? "Jews are not really people, so it is OK to kill them"

People say that "this is different, the fetuses REALLY aren't people". Well, don't you think that is what Hitler would say? I AM RIGHT, everyone else is wrong?

Hitler thought what he did was right. Slave owners thought slavery was right. However, history proved them both wrong. Will history prove us wrong? Will we soon regret killing millions of members of our race? Except, instead of killing members of other races, we are killing our own children.

It seems pretty obvious that this will backfire. We are already running low on social security, when we could have an extra million or two people paying into it. What do you think? Will this be the next Holocaust?

Answer 1

You have a point there, also the discoverers of the new world conveniently at first considered Indians not persons, therefore could be made slaves,and even killed if they willed, until the catholic church said Indians had a soul, and were persons.

According to your argument there is a link between this positions.

All of this extermination positions were applied to the convenience of persons that simply wanted to use an argument to support their theory and go on with their plans, but inside their heads and thoughts they knew they were wrong, and were and are just satisfying their own needs.

Answer 2

Not only that, but both the Dred Scot decision in 1857 and the Roe v. Wade decision purported to be based on the exact same constitutional principle: due process. In the Dred Scot ruling, Chief Justice Taney said that if the federal government prohibits slavery in federally-controlled territory, then it violates the slave-owner's right to due process guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment. Then about 115 years later, Justice Blackmun claimed that when a state government prohibits abortion, it violates the pregnant woman's right to due process guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. Hence, both a slave-owner and a pregnant woman have the "right" to do something which government is trying to prohibit. Both of the assertions are lies, because the due process clause is, to quote Robert Bork, "simply a requirement that the substance of any law be applied to a person through fair procedures by any tribunal hearing a case. The clause says nothing whatsoever about what the substance of the law must be." From the Dred Scot opinion: "The rights of property are united with the rights of person, and placed on the same ground by the fifth amendment to the Constitution, which provides that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, and property, without due process of law. And an act of Congress which deprives a citizen of the United States of his liberty or property, merely because he came himself or brought his property into a particular Territory of the United States, and who had committed no offence against the laws, could hardly be dignified with the name of due process of law." From the Roe v. Wade opinion: "This right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as we feel it is, or, as the District Court determined, in the Ninth Amendment's reservation of rights to the people, is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy."

Answer 3

This is nothing more than a stupid, useless effort to justify your own opinion as being right. You as much as said so when you stated "I am right, everyone else is wrong."

Take off the blinders, stop reading all of the one-sided propaganda that you've been reading, do some real, independent research....and then maybe you'll see just what an inane statement you've made.

Answer 4

The next holocaust will be the furniture holocaust. Think about it. Right now people say, "Furniture doesn't have feelings. It's not human. It's made of wood and metal." But they said that about black people, and they said that about Jews, and they were wrong, so they're also wrong about furniture.

Hitler would have said, "That's just a desk! Nobody will care if I destroy it with a chainsaw!" And anything Hitler says is wrong, so please don't hurt your furniture.

Answer 5

Marget Sanger the great woman who believe in abortion was a supporter of the Nazis.
She too believe that if a woman had too many children abortion should be allow and to the little ones too.
Pro-choice wants to make sure we consider the fetus anything but human that way it is easier to kill.

Pro-choice are all for violence in the womb they are willing to suck the brains out crush skulls without question or restriction.
It doesn't matter how old or how far along. 1 female is allow to make a choice of life or death for someone who doesn't even get a vote. Yet they are the same people who can't understand why a mass murder would be put to death.

Answer 6

i would like to rid people like you off the world
who cares what the hell you think. If i am not direclty affectsing your life than you have no right to say a damn thing about the way i live it or the decsions i make.
you are the nazi, you are the slave owner. you are the one wanting to make more rules to control people to do what you think is right. bastar d

Answer 7

I'd say the only connection is their ignorance as to what life is.

Answer 8

Aside from whether you think you can get away with posting your opinion under the guise of a question, do you actually have a question?

Answer 9

WOW! Nazis would be totally against abortion.

Answer 10

there is a connection. they are all things of the past.