2007-01-15 00:41:47 · 31 answers · asked by Amit B 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
No Sorry to say this that He is not a good actor, but really he is a good human being no doubt. But as far as acting is concern, he is not upto the mark. Actauly he is an very active actor like his father. An Actor should be well versed in all shades of Actinv like Emotion/Action/Romance/Dance/Comedy. Abhshek lacks most departments of Acting. When he does some emotional scene, he face doesnt give the right feelings to audience, comedy is certainly not for Abhishek, ya he can dance well, Action well but overall he needs lots lots of improvments.
2007-01-15 18:10:06 · answer #1 · answered by The Answering Machine 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In a sense he is both. He comes up with a good performane in yuva, then he acts like a dud in dhoom 2. Maybe its about the right role and most importantly the right director. He is being appreciated in guru, and is being touted already for a best actor nomination, which he will no doubt gain. He is lucky...very lucky...he is amitabh bachchan's son, which is why he got so many chances. If he was from outside the industry, he wouldn't be in the industry now!!!
2007-01-15 01:33:44 · answer #2 · answered by ash 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Abhishek happens to be one of my favourite all time actors. He has the genes from 2 great parents that are awesome actors. And I think he will follow in his father's footsteps and become a legend just like him!
2007-01-15 12:55:26 · answer #3 · answered by Green Eyes 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He knows no acting, it's just his daddy cool's untiring efforts, to hype him, that he has survived.
gave a series of flops, some movies clicked because of rani mukerjee, but he ditched her for Ash, and now engaged to her. God only knows ! might end up as another Vivek oberai ?
Guru is Mani's film, and I don't know, why every time he is obliging bacchans ?
I feel sorry for the guy, why did he have to choose this career ?
with those dumb expressions on his face, and that thanda gait, don't you think, he would have been good as a hotel owner, perhaps ?
2007-01-15 01:27:17 · answer #4 · answered by palador 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
abhishek bachchan is a good actor no doubts... but somewhere... he tries to copy mr amitabh bachchan... and he's not that very versatile as mr bachchan was in his golden days...
2007-01-15 00:59:59 · answer #5 · answered by angel_apoorva 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A fluke with an inflluential father to boot !!!
2007-01-16 15:35:40 · answer #6 · answered by ๏๓ รђคภtเ, รђคภtเ รђคภtเ ....... ! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hi amit,
i think he is director boy.. well he was so dumb in somany films but he is really good in few films like yuva, bunty-babali, dhoom ..
specially when you see guru.. you feel like kissing him.. he is so good in that.. i am sure or i can bet that no other actor can do justifactin so that role.. be it hritik -or srk.. i think mani ratnam and abhishek's suit each other..
well hope he continue with his guru style performance
2007-01-15 04:15:04 · answer #7 · answered by bebu 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
frankly speaking i would say he is an actor with average acting skills but frm time to time he shows flashes of being a really good actor.. i suppose given the time and with proper direction he will become master of his art.. nodoubt he does show his pappa's genes frm time to time:-)
2007-01-15 02:58:36 · answer #8 · answered by menakshistar 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If people like his movies, means his movies does not flop at box-office, then he is a good actor, Public decide it, agree
2007-01-15 00:54:45 · answer #9 · answered by Harinder S. Johal 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hes a good actor but not good luking at all!
2007-01-15 01:41:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋