2007-01-15 00:35:42 · 6 answers · asked by Blonde & Sharp 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I don't know why people have such negative opinions about this...James Bond is a generic secret agent...It isn't like he is the only 007 working for the queen. Why can't he be blonde, redhead, brunette or even bald.
2007-01-15 00:41:47 · answer #1 · answered by pipi08_2000 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't really care whether it's blonde or not... for the longest time I thought Roger Moore was blonde too...
I have more problems about the movie itself, then having 007 being blonde... mind you, he is a spy, and might need to put on different disguise if needed... so hair color might be different from time to time...
2007-01-15 08:40:44 · answer #2 · answered by admiral_chiu 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sean Connery was the ultimate bond and Pierce Brosnan was the rightful heir to his throne. Blonde bonds no way.
2007-01-15 09:29:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I was enjoying Pierce Brosnan. The blonde thing just doesn't fit properly
2007-01-15 08:38:45 · answer #4 · answered by Ren 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No it's not the hair color, it's the actor himself.
I love Pierce Brosnan to bits in that role!
2007-01-15 08:42:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't think his hair colour really matters-Daniel Craig was very good though!
2007-01-15 12:34:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋