Probably not. While I like his concepts, he was a minister, and I do not like the idea of the leader of our country being a church leader.
2007-01-15 01:46:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Feeling Mutual 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, but if you really want a radical left-wing Socialist in the Presidency, both Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton would like the job and they are just as unqualified as M.L. King, Jr. was.
2007-01-15 02:29:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by senior citizen 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
in my opinion i imagine he ought to have supported us in simple terms as he did all the others that necessary help. Their replaced right into a time the position blacks were not dealt with with respect and dignity and he replaced that for the most section. Now there is the problem of sexual orientation, faith and gender (both between the latter in effortless words to an quantity in recent times). i ought to wish to imagine that if he replaced into the kind of best recommend for equivalent rights and humane treatment he should be proper behind us in assisting us immediately. relax in peace, Marting Luther King, Jr.
2016-11-23 19:28:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes!
This prophet believed in peace and in following his dreams.
He was an activist, and the Good that he has done is still alive and well.
I am sad that so many young people today know his name, but really aren't aware of all he did, and how brave he was.
Blessings
2007-01-15 00:58:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Wood Smoke ~ Free2Bme! 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I wouldn't even bother voting, because THIS secret and evil group has been in control of everything for far too long!...
http://www.rense.com/general58/suspre.htm
2007-01-16 04:13:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes he would hopefully be as brave, as smart, as encouraging and motivated as his father and would do very proud in office
2007-01-15 00:23:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by bannierocks 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
plainly stated, No. he would try to change everything about our way of life to make everything as fair and nice and sugar coated as can be. he would just be another wining liberal. a extremely far left liberal
2007-01-16 15:43:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by ronny 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. While he did some admirable things, they didn't qualify him (in my eyes) for the presidency. He'd also be pretty old.
2007-01-15 00:23:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
sure because we need some body that cares about the troops and somebody who hates wars
2007-01-15 00:24:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
depending on his platform and his accomplishments in the last few years...probably
2007-01-15 00:27:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋