I say chop their right foot off just above the ankle.
2007-01-14 19:18:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Docta Jones 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
First offense, pay for all damages out of their own pocket, 6 months without a license. Now in some countries, the first offense is your last because they put the offender in front of a firing squad. Second offense, SR22 insurance at a rate of about $1000 per month after getting their license back, no driving privileges for a year, same cost requirements as for the first time, and classes to learn how to drive all over again, with the drivers test being done on a high speed track with a lot of obstacles to avoid. If these people think they can drink and drive, then the most difficult of vehicle handling tests should be part of getting their license back. If they fail, they go back to the beginning. All of this would be at their own expense. Yes, the test would be designed such that failure is routine. No one made them drink, if they can't be more responsible than what they were, they don't need to be on the road.
2007-01-14 19:30:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
outline less than the impact of alcohol. in effortless words 8% of injuries contain alcohol, even then, a number of the injuries ought to have exceeded off besides. Now, seventy 5% of injuries contain drivers between the a at the same time as of 17 and 25. what's the suitable way of reducing injuries? am i able to make a evaluation. a center elderly/older driving force, having had a modicum of alcohol, utilising overdue at evening, on a direction that he's known with like the again of his hand, with particularly any pedestrians round, is way a lot less risky than a mushy smart Alec utilising immediately in the course of the day, in a outfitted up section, stone chilly sober. With some exceptions, that is the more youthful drivers who've presented 'so called' drink utilising into disrepute. earlier the breathalyser, i visit truly say that i do not recognize of any center elderly/older driving force who ever knocked each person down. And believe me, at one time, it replaced into completely standard tochronic living house from the pub after some pints. the coolest human beings were in mattress and there replaced into by no skill a difficulty. Suck on that.
2016-11-23 19:13:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by pfeifer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I see a future where every car has some type of system to know if the driver is intoxicated etc. Unfortunatly it may only be for alcohol.. there are other things that could cause accidents also.
I think there should be a mandatory breathalizer installed on anyones car on the first offence that has a heafty monthly due for its rental. Anyone caught driving in a car w/o it should lose there liscence for around 2 yrs. Another offence.. Lose it for life.
2007-01-14 19:26:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by camrenalexis2 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The punishment should be the same whether or not they hit somebody/something. The important thing is that they were driving drunk, out of control, and very well could've gotten someone killed. I think that ALL drunk drivers should have their licenses suspended permanently. Drunks are idiots. Drunk drivers are idiots who need to be restrained. If you do it once, a fine is not going to stop you from doing it again, and eventually you WILL hurt someone.
2007-01-18 05:48:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by stickymongoose 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
They should have their, or whomever car they are driving taken away and sold at auction. Lose their license, forever...Prison at least a year...If they are involved in an accident where or not another car is involved, no less than 10 years...Fined...
I'm glad your alive, my dad was killed by a drunk driver...I was a firefighter and i have seen many drunk driving accidents, I'm really mean to them if i have to work on them, i do it with a smile on my face. I will never forget the 11 week old baby that died in my arms from one, i wished him the drunk driver dead, he wasn't even hurt...I could go on this makes me so angry....
2007-01-14 20:14:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by ABBYsMom 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
we actually had to do a report on this topic last yr. I beielive you should get your license suspended for 6 month to a yr if a police officer catches you or if you are in any accident drunk. Also they should have a sticker on thier license plate and somewhere else on the car just so other vehicles can see that they had a first offense already.
2007-01-15 01:42:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by tabatha1333 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They should lose their Drivers licences permanently and spend a few years in the Crowbar hotel which they can just enter and not exit without the keys.
2007-01-17 10:41:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by markusfarkus33 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
f***** drunk drivers. they should get their license taken away from a period of time and have some kind of torture like a little device or something that can tst their driving before they actually drive. or like have someone make sure they are sober EVERYTIME they get into a car, until they are finally trusted. they should be tortured.
2007-01-14 19:19:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that a person caught DUI should be mercilessly Charged with attemped murder, 0 tolerance,maximum penalty!!! Then maybe people will start taking the issue seriously.
2007-01-18 02:37:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by al b 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Anyone caught drinking and driving, should lose their license for the rest of their life. Driving is a privilege, not a right, if you are not responsible, you shouldn't be allowed to drive period.
2007-01-14 21:50:07
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋