Besides religious reasons why are people against gay marriages?

Question

I need to argue against gay marriages for school so i was wondering what are some reasons besides it being against the bible, why would people be against gays getting married? thanks for the help

Answer 1

I don't know. I guess people just think that it's wierd for to guys to get married. But for me i don't care who get married with who. If you love them it doesn't matter who your with.

Answer 2

In a Pagan point of view, Gay Marriage is not productive for a society. The main reason is that it does not produce a future generation. A future generation is important to preserve a nation as well as the rest of the nation. Although it is probably more because of abortion, Gay Marriage would also hurt Social Security.

Also, one argument is that Gays can't get the certain tax breaks that heterosexual couples get when they are married. However, the reason heterosexual marriages receieve these tax breaks is because they produce a future generation. A future generation that will be future taxpayers, and more important, future consumers.

Answer 3

Right now gay people are just argue about "Every body has the right to love some body no matter if that person is the same sex."
Too many people think that this will not hurt no body and it is no bad. But if same sex marriage is accepted, later the gay couples gonna ask for another law to compleat their marriage(home), pretty sure they gonna say thing like this: "Since we canot have babys, now we are asking for a law that allow us to adopt a baby,so our family will be complete." Now can you imagine a kid living in a house where his parents are two womans kissing each other, or two mans having a relationship(like man and woman),maybe that kid will grow up with too many confusions like why I have two Mothers or two Fathers and my friends have a Father and a Mother.
What gonna happend when that kid see two Mans or two Womans kissing each other, What they gonna say; " Oh,it's O.K.,this is completly normal." Or how they gonna explain that to their kid. What if this little kid try to do the same at the school (Boy kissing an other Boy).
The problem is a lot bigger then just accept gay marriges,this gonna be just the beggining of a lot of more cituations and they gonna ask for more laws like this one which is just against all laws: God law,society law,nature law,etc.
P.S.
"I DO NOT HATE GAYS." But I do not agree with same sex marriage.
There is no law (Besides God's law) that prohibit two man or woman relationship,they can live togather,sleep togather(Have sex),love each other.So they do not need to be married,marriage is God law,but since they are not following God's law(Having same sex relationship),than why they are asking to have the opportunity of having a marriage. I think this is just the beggining of some thing much,much serious.

GOD BLESS YOU!

Answer 4

properly, i'm for gay marriage purely because of the fact i don't think that the government has the the terrific option to define who has the the terrific option to be married- in case you lookup the word marriage interior the dictionary- it states that it is the union between 2 human beings--- it does not state guy/lady. Now to your project, besides the bible, "they" experience that a union between gays might fall down the kin values that our great united states has been based upon. it might confuse infants having 2 mothers and a pair of dads. even in spite of the undeniable fact that there is something like a 70% ratio of ladies human beings raising infants without fathers, our great leaders nonetheless experience that gay marriage could be the astounding loss of life of our kin values--- infants may be reported without the male/or lady nurturing. Financially, the government has lots to lose because of the fact singles pay extra in earnings taxes than married couples, and the coverage lobbyists may be livid notwithstanding if that's allowed because of the fact their losses may be interior the billions because of the fact their "companions" may be entitled to scientific wellbeing coverage under the regulation as an significant different. With the HIV/help drugs being on the vanguard of the main costly costs by coverage firms seconded by maximum cancers, allowing them to be coated by a working healthful mate might make the coverage companies draw back.

Answer 5

I'm against homosexuals "marrying" for the same reason I am against cows flying. Flying is a violation of the definition of "cow". It is not within the nature of a cow to fly. Flying for such an animal is impossible, regardless of whether it is "allowed" or not.
Homosexuals cannot "marry" because such an arrangement is a violation of the definition of "marriage". It is not within the nature of marriage to accept same-sex couples. Marriage for such a couple is impossible, regardless of whether it is "allowed". And changing the definition of "marriage" won't change the reality of the situation, any more than changing the definition of "cow" would do so.
.

Answer 6

for what its worth, I oppose"normalizing" anything gay as in my view each win for gays is loss for me. I do not hate gays, I work with them just fine . I was in the military and gays were beat up, troops I knew did not want them around, kissing each other in the shower, etc. I just am not interested in their life style, I prefer not to walk by a desk at work and see photo of two men kissing, I do not want to have my grandchildren in public schools have to listening to gay life style stories, examples, by the teachers and have to sit in on sex ed classes that portray the gay lifestyle, nice photos of the nude gay couple. Sorry for rambling, too late for me, just want to try to give you some help, one of the few legit ??s on this site. Last thought, gays want to be treated as if they are normal, like everyone else, I don't think they are. I also do not think they chose to be gay.

Answer 7

judging by the answers here it would seem that Christians against gays don't have very highly developed reading comprehension skills...they seem to have missed the bit about "BESIDES RELIGIOUS REASONS"

Answer 8

The purpose of marriage as far as society is concerned is to make it economically feasable to provide the core of a family of two parents and the children that are related to both parents. Gay couples cannot reproduce together and thus do not need this incentive. Recognition of gay marriage also opens the door to further broadening of marriage to unclude group marriage, marriage between people and animals, between adults and children, etc.

Answer 9

People are creatures of habit. Anything that goes against tradition will upset some people. Same sex marriage is non-traditional just as racial integration used to be. Not so long ago a black person could not eat in a restaurant without upsetting whites. That's not the case anymore so traditions can change.

Answer 10

Main Entry: mar·riage
Pronunciation: 'mer-ij, 'ma-rij
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English mariage, from Anglo-French, from marier to marry
1 a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (

Answer 11

It is against the laws` of nature ! A marriage is between a man and a woman , to reproduce and create a family . Its` really going to be hard for you to keep GOD`s law out of this argument , as it is His Law that condemns man with man , and woman with woman .. It is un-natural !!