Velasquezes?

Question

painter

Answer 1

Velázquez (or Velásquez), Diego (1599-1660). Spain's greatest painter was also one of the supreme artists of all time. A master of technique, highly individual in style, Diego Velasquez may have had a greater influence on European art than any other painter.

Diego Rodriguez de Silva Velasquez was born in Seville, Spain, presumably shortly before his baptism on June 6, 1599. His father was of noble Portuguese descent. In his teens he studied art with Francisco Pacheco, whose daughter he married. The young Velasquez once declared, "I would rather be the first painter of common things than second in higher art." He learned much from studying nature. After his marriage at the age of 19, Velasquez went to Madrid. When he was 24 he painted a portrait of Philip IV, who became his patron.

The artist made two visits to Italy. On his first, in 1629, he copied masterpieces in Venice and Rome. He returned to Italy 20 years later and bought many paintings--by Titian, Tintoretto, and Paolo Veronese--and statuary for the king's collection.

Except for these journeys Velasquez lived in Madrid as court painter. His paintings include landscapes, mythological and religious subjects, and scenes from common life, called genre pictures. Most of them, however, are portraits of court notables that rank with the portraits painted by Titian and Anthony Van Dyck.

Duties of Velasquez' royal offices also occupied his time. He was eventually made marshal of the royal household, and as such he was responsible for the royal quarters and for planning ceremonies.

In 1660 Velasquez had charge of his last and greatest ceremony--the wedding of the Infanta Maria Theresa to Louis XIV of France. This was a most elaborate affair. Worn out from these labors, Velasquez contracted a fever from which he died on August 6.

Velasquez was called the "noblest and most commanding man among the artists of his country." He was a master realist, and no painter has surpassed him in the ability to seize essential features and fix them on canvas with a few broad, sure strokes. "His men and women seem to breathe," it has been said; "his horses are full of action and his dogs of life."

Because of Velasquez' great skill in merging color, light, space, rhythm of line, and mass in such a way that all have equal value, he was known as "the painter's painter." Ever since he taught Bartolomé Murillo, Velasquez has directly or indirectly led painters to make original contributions to the development of art. Others who have been noticeably influenced by him are Francisco de Goya, Camille Corot, Gustave Courbet, Edouard Manet, and James McNeill Whistler. His famous paintings include The Surrender of Breda, an equestrian portrait of Philip IV, The Spinners, The Maids of Honor, Pope Innocent X, Christ at Emmaus, and a portrait of the Infanta Maria Theresa.

Answer 2

no person exchange into bowled over, Kongo has no floor recreation, Velasquez is a precise point wrestler, What exchange into wonderful is that He did not bypass down while Cheick rocked him stressful a pair circumstances, Kongo is an rather sturdy striker, So i'm kinda very much bowled over that there is plenty grievance of Cain-after a dominating win over a precise ten heavyweight, It exchange into purely his 6th combat-provide him it slow to paintings on his recreation, I study as many predictions as Cain prevailing that have been for Kongo knocking him out, C'mon that 1st rd blow he took from Kongo could have knocked out maximum heavyweights-He did the sensible element and took it to the floor. Couture's not rocking every physique returned (that's not 2005) until that's himself on his porch with a blanket on his lap, And Noguiera's one punch from a similar state as Chuck, you think of one dimensional Brock is unbeatable? did not end the very problem-free Herring, and beat a 45yr previous-Yeah, now thats staggering! provide Cain a destroy, Carwin's overwhelmed ONE high quality fighter, does not placed him interior the precise 5 yet.

Answer 3

Que

Answer 4

What a hideus, horrible way you have of making the plural of that last name

Answer 5

No, I don't, well, not usually. Do you?