I like the idea of skimming 40% off the top for any invader who wires money back to mexico as a small way of recovering there expenses racked up here in America. Jose puts out 300 dollars to western union blammo, when maria gets her check in Mex she 120 dollars less stolen drug money. We win. I like.
2007-01-14 13:44:57 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Answer to 4, just the dirty mexicans, the companys provide jobs.
2007-01-14 13:54:24 · update #1
No, but we could require proof of legal presence and legal provenance of the money.
2007-01-14 13:57:02 · answer #1 · answered by DAR 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes, I think we should. I also think you should have to prove that you have legal residency status in the US before being able to send money to another country. However, all this would cause is the illegals getting their legal friends or relatives to do the wiring for them. However, tax it anyways because it is money leaving our economy, but still make it a bit harder by requiring to prove legal residency status (meaning that you are in the country legally, whether with a green card or citizenship or legal immigration).
2007-01-14 15:20:49 · answer #2 · answered by Daisy 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, just like a service like Western Union. It would be a very good way to get some back.
2007-01-14 13:58:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
wouldn't that be illegal? if not,how about take the idea further and citizens get 40% off the top from the welfare our government sends to other countries? i know of one country alone that gets 5 billion a year.
2007-01-14 13:51:06 · answer #4 · answered by kissmy 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that we are living in a world where we pay for services in order for the economy to run. We all have to pay a portion of the pie in order for the government to run.
2007-01-14 13:51:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why should we? We have a free market society and there is no limit to repatriation. Trust me... there are greater lobbiest against repatriation limits then immigration. No one gives a S*** about a Mexican sending money back to his family when you have multi-trillion dollar a year German and Japanese companies wiring their profits over. Should they pay to or just the 'dirty Mexicans'.
Ignorant racists...
Response to the ignorant racist who posted this question. Have you tried to get a job in landscaping, fast food or migrant farm work recently??? These people don't provide a service? Idiot...
2007-01-14 13:50:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
How bout we do it when you go on vacation outside the U.S. and need a wire transfer. NO . if they earn it they should be able to send it. Just needs to be earned honestly. And we should kill invaders. So what should it be. Come here legally, do legal things and no one should have a problem. be a scumbag and they should be treated as such.
2007-01-14 13:53:11 · answer #7 · answered by friendly advice from maine 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
yeah, and not only that, take the cost of deporting an illegal mexican out of the money that we subsidize Mexico with.
2007-01-14 13:49:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
We take more than enough of their money in taxes and social security,that mexicans will never receive.How would you like it if the usa took 40% of your wages for keeping mexicans in mexico.puta
2007-01-14 14:08:54 · answer #9 · answered by m 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Hmmmmm yes.
2007-01-14 13:50:08 · answer #10 · answered by rebel_gurl002 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋